Ex Community Director Sov

THIS IS LOVE NOW. ACCEPT IT OR YOU'RE A RACIST AND YOU WILL BE BANNED.

AS YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE HERE I +1'ED BOTH OF YOUR GIFS.. ONE OF TURTLE MAN AND THE OTHER OF UMM... A FATHER SENDING HIS SON OFF TO SCHOOL. I SUPPORT YOUR LIFE CHOICES. ALL OF YOU ARE RACIST IF YOU DON'T +1 @ -Shawn- 'S GIFS.

UNFORTUNTELY UNDER THE NEW PC POLICY, SLAY QUEEN IS MANDATORY NEWSPEAK. AS IS YOUR RIGHT TO POST GIFS OF ... GROWN MEN KISSING LITTLE BOYS.. BUT ITS NOT SEXUAL. YOURE NOT ONE OF THOSE. PLEASE DONT BAN ME. I DO NOT WISH TO BE BANNED AGAIN FOR IMPLYING WHAT I IMPLIED IN FOLLOWING IMAGE 'SHAWN IS NOT A PEDO.PNG' I'M TRYING MY BEST TO ALLOW YOU TO DO WHATEVER YOU WANT. IN THE FUTURE WE WILL NEED A NEW WORD FOR YOUR PROCLIVITIES THAT DON'T HAVE SUCH NEGATIVE CONNOTATIONS. I SUPPORT YOUR RIGHT TO WATCH ANIME I JUST HONESTLY ASSUMED IT HAD ROBOTS OR NINJAS OR SOMETHING.

SHAWN THAT APPEARS TO BE A GROWN MAN WITH A LITTLE BOY. I SUPPORT YOUR RIGHT TO WATCH WHATEVER CARTOONS YOU WISH. PLEASE DON'T BAN ME I ACCEPT YOU AS YOU ARE. SLAY QUEEN.. @ Milo IS THIS HOW YOUR MODERATOR TRAINING IS? I SUPPORT ALL OF YOU.

YOU ARE A GROWN MAN WITH CARTOONS DRAWN ALL OVER YOU. YOU DONT NEED A HAIRLINE TO LOOK YOUTHFUL. YOURE PERFECT. FAXE YOU CANNOT SAY THAT ANYMORE. THE ONLY THING YOU ARE ALLOWED TO SAY ABOUT SOMEONE'S APPEARANCE IS 'SLAY QUEEN.' TY FOR YOUR COOPERATION. I WILL DO MY BEST TO STOP SHAWN FROM BANNING YOU. 88 BIG JOHN ONLY LIKES TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH ADULT WOMEN.

IF ANYONE COMPLAINS ABOUT THE NUDITY YOU ARE NOW A HOMOPHONBE AND WILL BE BANNED PER @ -Shawn- .

ALSO TO BE MORE IN LINE WITHOUR NEW WOKE AGENDA, ALL BLACK PEOPLE AND WOMEN ON THE SERVER ARE NOW GOING TO BE STAFF. PLEASE ADDRESS EVERYONE AS XER. THANK YOU.

OLYMPUS HAS CHANGED AND OUR KING ADMIN @ -Shawn- IS LEADING US TO GREATNESS. I WILL BE REPORTING ANY COMMENTS MADE ABOUT ME THAT I FIND OFFENSIVE OR IN POOR TASTE! ALL THREADS CRITIZING STAFF WILL BE DELETED. ALL HAIL THE NEW ORDER! ALSO DO NOT CALL ME A TRANNY OR I WILL REPORT YOU. AND DON'T CALL SHAWN THAT THING HE HATES BEING CALLED DON'T CALL HIM THAT. OLYMPUS WOKE NOW!

No thanks... If i need someone to cry to I'll find someone that matters.

Nah nah. Out attitude is fuck anything that 5% of the server cares about, i.e. bombs, and house fires are about the same thing. They provide nothing at all to the server and are a waste of resources and stop people from using houses. Let's get rid of house fires. Should be to up civs since medics fucking over civs that use bombs.

While we're at it let's get rid of the useless shit that nobody cares about like taxis and firefighting.

If you think runing titans while I'm in first place is scary to me you don't understand my motivations. Triple the Titan cost.

You guys did everything in your power to prevent a good and honest discourse on the matter. You cannot flex the love of a good debate after that. I asked to just be able to make a statement to ya'll in teamspeak, because you know godamned well most of the people who voted just tune out after a single paragraph of writing. @ Marcus blocked that. You did everything you could to prevent that vote to be an honest process. When someone wants to move a chickenwire fence on a conquest map they hold a whole session and get as many opinions as they can, and pull devs in and as many conquest players as humanly possible. When someone wants to inititate a drastic rule change on s1, Grandma Gary says "idfc let the career medics do it.'

Any vote that is unanimous is extremely sus. It means there was forces at work preventing it from being an honest poll. Try getting a unanimous vote out of CC about anything and watch what happens. People voted how they were 'supposed to' and I wasn't given a chance to actually discuss it. Ya'll kept it behind closed doors and sealed off.

Because all the people who use bombs know the rules. You improperly doing a ticket isn't the news flash you think it is.

Never has been. Has never been a single ticket in the history of the server where blowing up or planting bombs has been considered engagement unless it his a player or vehicle. I agree with the principle of the matter. I once comped someone a million because I assumed it was and was told by staff it never is under any circumstances. But when you actually play the game enough that you understand how things work, you understand that it's not practical do to so. You got some staff that have no idea what they're doing or how anything works, dramatically changing the rules in the completely wrong way. If they were going to change it it should have been handled properly, discussed with roundtable, ect just to bail your boy out. What are you going to do if you pull up on me and I'm standing next to a bomb next to your shed? You going to kill me? What are you going to do when it turns out that bomb isn't mine and your boy or you gets banned for it? I honestly 100% agree, if it were really that simple, planting bombs should be engagement. But that's like a child saying 'we should never go to war ever' about their country. It's an idealistic and extremely naïve take by someone with no understanding or experience of how thing actually work. There are so many holes and flaws in that system that it's just not practical. Staff just refused to listen because being right is more important than logic, and because @ Marcus is confused as to why so many people want to blow stuff up in his firetruck simulator.

We keep letting sr. r&r handle major decisions with engagement rules pretty soon driving too fast is going to be engagement. Why would you tbh. You've been handed a ticket to legally rdm.

If i never could have won, why they finagle this situation into a one way engagement? Seems like coward tactics to me. Afraid to war, and suck staff off to change the server rules for em. I think at the end of the day AOS is upset that they're my side project and not my main bitches like NBB.

You can always list it on ah

This was almost a year ago. I'm 40.

Your promotions as staff are not dependent on how much work you put in, or how much time you spending learning precedents, and making fair judgements. It's just a popularity contest based on who you're friends with crossed with how loud you clap and cheer whenever someone with higher seniority makes a decision. And then they hold 'votes' on their decision, and if you don't agree with what the person holding vote says is his opinion, then you'll be a moderator for an inordinate amount of time if you make it that far. I'm a thinker, not a ticket bot. CC is where I belong, and not even with rank... because nobody is going to inform me of what my opinion is.

Still going down that road to a certain point. The moment I could, the game wouldn't be fun anymore as anything other than being staff... and that would never hold my interest as much as skat/civ.

Was 8 months ago at a time I wasn't even active in game bud. The actual application that I knew they wouldn't even take. Was just a long shot out of boredom. What is your Age? 39 How well do you work with a team? Quite well Can you work well under pressure? Very much so. I thrive under pressure. How would you describe yourself? Stern but Jovial. A joker with limits. How are your people skills? Good when I want to be. How would others describe you? A leader. What are your strengths? Unbias. Not afraid to challenge my own friends as equally as rivals. What are your weaknesses? Used to have a lot.. tbh I've worked through most of them over my years. I address them as I become aware of them. How are you at handling multiple tasks at one time? Efficient and organized. How would you react if a decision was over-ruled by a higher rank? Communicate and figure out why it happened. Defend with precedent if I feel I'm correct, learn if I'm wrong. Anything else you would like to add? I know not a chance in a million years you guys are going to accept this. I'm not support staff, but I'm the one that half the support team comes to in the middle of the night with questions. Chances are I've got a better grasp of the rules than most mods and lower admins being the level I no lifed this on s1 for 7k hours. That being said, it would be worth coming back for as a new challenge as I have no property left to ruin the fun of the game by getting mod perms. I work very well with new players. Promoted the server. Made tons of content. I already know the answer, but it's your loss..I assure you

Nah its facts. Soon as I could spawn stuff in I'd lose all interest in the server.

I was just looking for a way to make the game interesting again. I don't even want staff. No cap, if they offered it to me out of nowhere I would 100% turn it down forever. Being staff is basically being a mindless ticket puncher. They want people who agree, barely play, barely know any thing about the game or the mechanics or the rules who don't have opinions of their own. I'm a CC at heart. I will always state my opinion, and never suck weewee for promotions. The fact that you see unanimous votes happening as often as they do is indicative that their voting system is based on politics and sucking up. If they handled their voting with true anonymity you'd see a lot more... disagreement.