The Sovereign

Was off the top of my head. Like your hairline.

Of all the things you're already flexxing, you're trying to flex having money on an arma 3 roleplay server now. Save some pussy for the rest of us jesus.

You know that's not me right? Please stop using sentences with so many s's in them. Kind of the whole point. That channel only exists for arma montages. 27 subs are just Arma weirdos. You put TV in your name and probably quit working at McDonald's the next day expecting to be famous.

You got TV in your name. Your parents didn't even pay attention to you and you really think the internet is going to? Hopefully you don't talk when you sleep at night, or you'd need a giant sponge for a pillow.

BROOO.... You cannot say that when your signature literally flexes getting whitelisted for multiple things 12 year olds have been whitelisted for in the past. Only one of us that's spitting here is you, lispy.

LoL... what you said was only three words but it takes up half the page because Honestly no, I don't have a lot of friends due to being an anti-social shut in... but thankfully I don't find myself cloutchasing that hard. You make me feel better about myself.

Please don't bully @ proud .

Honestly... I think it's a great thing to get rid of admin MM. It was highly advantageous to people who were friends with staff, and people who were friends with staff would use the concept to have friends pose as staff to scam people. It made it so people who were friends with staff never had to pay market fees, or transfer fees, or realtor fees, and basically allowed them to dupe money legally by the servers standard definition of duping.

No.. that's exactly what I expected to hear. I've been around from watching you be a retarded toxic kid all the way up to the point where you grew up and owned your actions. I was also once a retarded toxic kid that grew up. Take care of yourself Mr. @ Rafa

Wow... You wrote a 90lb book about leaving and not one shout out to me?

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter". One of yours said that. I'm just touting the virtues of democracy, but our average voter is only slightly smarter and more informed than the average cartel player.

Respect for individual's liberties is why you're still property of his majesty, and we're not. I have questions. Does the two way red name also trigger wp's?

I don't feel comfortable pushing that without a general consensus. I'll make another poll tonight. I like it personally, but that's majorly game changing and I'd want to make sure it'd have support before I throw my weight behind it.

@ Mako @ WALT You're the community managers. The people's opinion is absolutely overwhelming. At this point, it's a clear disservice to the server to ignore the opinion at large. What say you?

I'm going to book a flight over Ireland and throw blighted potatoes on every field I see. For real though @ Ryan ...if the server wants a change conducted that is this insanely lopsided, then not making that change is bad for the server.

I'm down for that too. They're too damn expensive for the ban happy treatment they get for every little thing and every staffs interpretation of the day.

Well considering speed bombs and ignition bombs cost that much and thus have no engagement rules at all, that might be a bit much. 800k is appropriate. Also...this is on the one issue almost every player across the board agree asylum is better than. Let's take the only thing they have over us

Shouldn't be so many do's and don'ts. The rules don't need to be that complicated just cause a cop got mad one time.

If people doing a fed allowed some guy with an obvious 600k vest in his underwear walk all the way up to the fed truck... they deserve it. In this situation the guy with the suivest is taking the bigger risk than the fed do'ers. Look at the vote. This isn't even close. Just make the change. Not doing so is just refusing to fashion the server into what the playerbase wants.

Suivests are better without staff injecting their interpretation of intent onto the matter. Just needless bureaucracy, meaningless bans, and an absolute aversion to the money sink doctrine staff are always calling for.

FREE THE SUIVEST AND MAKE ALLAH AKBAR VALID ROLEPLAY! EVERY PERSON SAYS THIS IS THE ONLY REASON ASYLUM IS BETER THAN OLYMPUS SO WHY NOT CHANGE THAT?

If I'm mistaken about this, that would be great. But the multiple staff who have explained it to me, both did not explain it like that, just that you can't use it at all unless engaged on. And when I asked if my statement is how it is, nothing was contested. I hope your right because that would at least make sense on some level and not be this incredibly stupid.

Apparently there's been other new rules added that almost nobody has been told about. Apparently you're no longer allowed to ever suivest cops at all unless they engage on you first. Incredibly stupid. Also, apparently, if cops have someone in custody for 5 mins, their group is no longer engaged with apd and have to engage again. APD sneaking a lot of ninja rules in to just ban people arbitrarily. All this needs rolled back. Suivests cost 600k. Cop kits are free. There is no reason to be giving them t his much of an advantage and making them completely immune to suivests. Civs need to be getting angry about this type of secret rule additions tbh.

There has been some... questionable interpretations of intent in the past regarding suivests that have led to players being banned. Proposing a rule change, and it has some significant support from people already, and I want the servers opinion at large. It's a simplifying rule. Straight forward, one line. "If an engaged player is legally killed with a suicide vest, all collateral damage, including vehicles, unengaged players, and players in restraints are legal crossfire" This would exclude situations of clear collusion, such as engaging on a friend who runs at them. The current system has been abused by apd to a point where players get banned for killing their friends in restraints, and leaves apd able to shield themselves with players in restraints because if a hostile player with a suivest approaches said player before exploding, their intent is interpreted as to kill the player. This rule change would simplify suicide vests, which cost 600k, and shouldn't have to pay a butthurt ban tax. Agree?