-
Posts
114 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Events
Store
Blogs
Gallery
Raffles
Everything posted by Exner21
-
bro that's some old arma fighting shit dude XD. get in to a fight with a gang and all of a sudden your TS is like hes…...over...…….hel…….ah...….eee.. very true. Ive seen hackers do a lot worse BS then ddos
-
I agree. it is very loos subject and that's my point. But as its written, it says nothing about how many gang tags are on, how big of a group is heavy gang activity, thers just to much grey in there. And a hawk is extremely impactful. A lot of players do not like getting wasted by hawk when all they have is a 30k bounty and an sting lol. I feel it should be clarified and used for evetns on the server that are more impactful. what do you think?
-
Your to young for this convo dude. Im talking micros and macros and your on some weird ass personal vendetta XD. If that's the case man then don't read it or post lol. Its pretty easy lol
-
Okay that's fine. But make that in the rule then. My point is anyone can interpret that rule anyway. We have 3 different interpretations of this rule already. I see the rule as we are fighting the cops and after seeing we have 8 gang members they respawn and come back with a hawk. not just randomly flying around until we see players to kill Kid id like to have a civil convo with you but you obviously are uncapable of that. I would argue that 6+ or 8+ is heavey gang activity. look at Black water. 30+ players have to do it to over come hawks.
-
So the ghost hawk came after 3 guys. But we never engaged him in the first place. It wasn't even a response. He was patrolling just to patrol. And eventually used the excuse that we had a tempest out. He justified 3 gang members as heavy gang activity.
-
I would absolutely agree! 3 guys with guns to me is not heavy gang activity. Yet a hawk will chase 1 guy in a little bird. More importantly police will say, theres a lot of different gang tags on the server. That's heavy gang activity. Let patrol with the ghost hawk.
-
Okay but what does heavy gang activity mean? that's my point
-
Not even gunna go down that road right now. Please explain how you interpret this rule "Ghosthawk patrols may be used to respond to heavy gang activity."
-
are you going to tell me how you interpret the rule of ghost hawks or not man. or are you having a hard time justifying killing 1player with it
-
You never answered the question. Explain how you interpret the rule of ghost hawks? yes we did. we healed him released him 600k from a garage. It was because we didn't release him right away after robbing him.
-
Theres a report submitted right now for robbing a cop an dnot releasing him at the first garage we passed. So we held him for 1min after robbing him. And the admin agreed we broke the rules
-
Weird then why was my guy banned for it?
-
You basically said we don't understand the rules lol kid its written right there. That's an extremely poor argument. You are on here because you know where right. and you don't want to admit it. your part of the problem. I expect to see more ghost hawks abused because of this post. And I was right. Ether way. stop acting like you have a higher knowledge of server rules. That's argument from authority and its a poor argument. Ether you explain how you interpret the rule or how it should be written so players don't misinterpret the rule. I don't wanna hear you try and and belittle me. Obviously I'm not the only player who feels this way. So your not doing yourself any favors ether. So you explain how you interpret the rule of ghost hawks So verbal or written is good for that but not for APD breaking rules and lying 2 seconds after. gotcha I would also not say this is not really dramatic. It was showing how rules are not followed how they are written. And its done a lot from the APD.
-
Lol okay. Cool story
-
I do. Its usually used for emphasizing a topic or importance. As for evidence, even if I show our videos it will always come down to, the APD bending rules to their liking. That's just how it is. There has been to many rules that are not followed as written. Example of this is when robbing. We have robbed cops, let them go within 1k of a garage, within 15mins. A new rule not written, of if u rob someone they need to be unrestrained immediately at the closest garage was implemented on us. A rule that is not written. I have seen vigis get banned for not saying "your going to jail" A very small mistake. Yet they get banned for it. A rule for police "Ghosthawk patrols may be used to respond to heavy gang activity." should have the same consequence. This rule needs to be rewritten as to what it means. Theres to much grey area. Lets be real man. A ghost hawk used for 3 or even 5 gang members is over done. You know it, I know it, everyone knows it. Ya its great u have that ability. But police loose nothing. You are the bully's of the server. To abuse your ability on civies that loose a lot for what you do to them is a dick move. If police had lost the gear on death then so be it. But they don't. To make a server enjoyable you need to allow civilians to win sometimes. Even if its small victory's but that doesn't happen.
-
Regardless. Hawks shouldn't be used for daily use. Period
-
Kid we have been shot down dozens of times in little birds, box trucks, sports hatch backs, orcas. Being in an armed vic means u can be killed on sight. We have been messaged so many times in these vics. No one fires and we still all get killed by the guns.
-
Here ill underline it for you message and given 10seconds. Those are all the rules kid The Ghosthawk Ghosthawk patrols may be used to respond to heavy gang activity. The weapons may only be used on aerial, or illegal vehicles (including APD Hunters and Striders) Must be sent a text to land or park and given 10 seconds to comply. If the Ghosthawk is fired upon it may return fire, and that specific ghosthawk remains guns hot until the situation is resolved. This includes when the Ghosthawk is presented with a clear threat (Example: civilian with an explosive launcher that has engaged the Ghosthawk via text or an explosive launcher clearly pointing at the Ghosthawk in a red zone) If multiple Ghosthawks have been shot down in the same situation, any Sergeant and above may decide to return to the situation guns hot provided they notify a member of the opposing force. If an APD Ghosthawk is stolen, the APD may use Any Means Necessary to recover it. The “guns hot” call must come from a Senior APD involved in the situation. Ghosthawks mirror the “guns hot” activity of other hawks. A Ghosthawk may be authorized "guns hot" within the federal event's anti-air circle after bomb blows at a federal event in cases where civilians are holding the area without the intent to leave. Exception: Ghosthawks are authorized "guns hot" after bomb blows on illegal vehicles within the federal event's inner anti-air circle. If a server restart occurs while the hawk is guns hot, it may return guns hot. The Armed Huron is treated as a Ghosthawk. If an officer fires any weapon out of the back "ramp" of the Armed Huron prior to being fired upon, that Armed Huron may not go "guns hot". It says illegal vics only But that's not the case if messaged
-
No not wrong. we have been flying around when we get messaged land by APD. Then 7 seconds later get roasted by a ghost hawk. No one shot. Yes it is allowed
-
I think yesterday when APD pulled 3 hawks flew around killing civies all day kinda proved that point.
-
No You can messaged anytime in a heli or vic and still be engaged. You can be killed because APD "says" someone "shot at us". Hands down ghost hawks should be used for actually server events. Like fed, blackwater, etc.
-
dud to counter a ghost you need an rpg or titan. Nether of which are cheap. I have never talked to a APD member that actually agrees with you man. Every cop knows its easy to make money as APD. And its extremely over powered. The police force should be just like civies in that you actually need to be good and play smart to make money. I do think the APD gets shafted on a lot as well. This whole split the bounty of your kills is BS. It should go to the officer that was the best shot. That worked for the kill. As much as I think APD needs to be nerfed I do think the APD is unfair to its players as well. That's completely bias. I have seen you ban players on talking about DDOS. There was no proof that they did anything but they where perma banned. How is this any different?
-
Because cops save their gear, cops have no nlr, Cops are already extremely over powered. They ruin the server being so over powered.
-
No ones heated. We want the server to be a fair and better place. Having APD try and brag or show they can break rules here. Makes players leave. I have stood up for the server. To keep players here. But its players like you that have been pushing them off the server for fair to long. I don’t think I will be standing up for the server anymore. Did you not watch the video? Your not very observant are you?