I will have to say I don't generally trust people to be fully good faith, or accurate, in their representation/interpretation of what others said.
If I may ask:
1. Do you believe Moonini is a pedophile, or child molester?
2. Is this something you yourself heard, or someone else told you he said? If it was someone else, could you please add them to the conversation as to avoid hearsay?
3. Was it in VC or text, and is there evidence of it?
4. Do you think Moonini would agree, or disagree, with your representation of what he said?
I would also appreciate it if you could make your claim stronger. Right now it's a particularly 'weak' claim, as in many interpretations are permissible under what you said, rather than just the default interpretation most people would assume under that wording. For example: lifting your brother up onto your shoulders at a sports game would be compatible with someone being a "kid toucher", if you could make a stronger claim such as him being a child molester, then that would be much more notable, but would more easily open you up to a libel lawsuit.
If you are further interested in this, I believe the motte and bailey fallacy would interest you, this could easily be a case of it where the claim you are trying to propagate would be: Moonini is a pedophile, but the claim you would defend if pushed against is: Moonini has atleast once touched a child (as in, helping them cross the street, or any other reasonable thing like that).
ALSO: I completely ignored your second sentence as I really am unsure what it is even supposed to mean. It could refer to really anything it's not even making a claim.
Thanks.