ThatNerdyGuy

It's going to be adjusted in a couple of weeks when the update is out. For now, it stays the same.

If there's a substantial amount of gangs on the server with a reasonable player pop, I don't see an issue with it. Checking a gang shed isn't against the rules. Just like it's not against the rules for civilians to camp an APD HQ. As seniors we hold ourselves to the accountability of only staying for at max 15 minutes. Mainly because certain individuals would camp and shed and get a watchtogether of YouTube videos going. You want people to do runs? Maybe you come up with a reason for people to spend money. The economy is fucked because there is nothing to spend your money on. Not because the APD patrol red zones. We increased the timer to 15 minutes for redzones as APD. On staff, we reduced the cost of trucks and provided incentives to owning cartels to process faster. The issue isn't runs, the issue is a money dump not being there. Dude, try moving and not staying in the same place. Unless you're holding down a hospital or a rebel, those you can typically hold down. Otherwise, thats why it's called a zerg.

Maybe, I'm interested.

Only acceptable reason is if your employer requires it. Otherwise, you might be a middle aged house wife who gets on the edge to look at her kids at college on Facebook. Edit - only joking btw. But edge sucks.

Damn dude, maybe yall should advertise it and maybe you'd get some strong candidates.

Yeah, I don't think you guys need more free warpoints for just throwing ideas at a wall and hoping some stick. @SuWooP, this man wants meetings.

insert generic sports quote about taking chances Jokes aside, if you don't bring it up up in your meeting then nothing really is going to happen.

Honestly man, it's good to hear someone with a similar opinion. Keep the seniors, lead and maybe 1 or 2 juniors and you've got the right people in the right positions.

Then come up with an idea and bring it to the council meeting and then to the staff meeting after you all agree on it! Making a post here every 3 days does nothing other than give popcorn materiel to everyone.

Aside from @Silton which, I respect his opinion. Those people haven't shown up. If you want to have a conversation, we can do that. If you want to talk shit, then I can just ignore your posts because nothing relevant will come out of it. I think if the civilian council would be a smaller, more focused group, you wouldn't have that issue. Right now you've got people just showing up for their free warpoints.

Man, you're not getting it. Like, I'm here because I want this server to perform and grow. What you're not understanding is that you don't even have the support of the civilian council which you are a part of.

Nah man, thats not my play here at all. I am all for discussion and suggestions. But when you're incorrect about the information you're trying to sell, then I'm going to correct you. I've said it earlier and I'll say it again. If you've only got your friends backing you in this community, it means nothing in the grand scheme of things. So if you want to push an agenda or get the support you need, then you need to sell other gangs on your idea.

Congrats on admin @Zeuse

Almost like one group is salty and is trying to artificially boost their support for their arguement.

If your issue is with the rules being done properly or enforced. Maybe you should make sure that you're complaining about a rule that was broken.

Let's put this to bed. 1. Patrolling is not an issue if high rebel activity is occurring. Based off of what @Zeuse posted. High rebel activity was observed prior to restart. 2. The engagement was "over" due to restart. However, the APD have the same existing knowledge that you have, as to where they are. So inevitably, the situation and can continue and start again. Thats why if an APD officer that can load lethals is lethals loaded, prior to restart, they can continue to lethal on the same situation at the start of the new restart. 3. Please see my 2nd post. 4. Don't bother putting a report in, with the evidence you've provided. Nothing was done wrong. I can tell you that I broke NLR 3 years ago but does that mean anything now? No. Unless you've got in game, video proof of someone breaking a rule. It is insufficient.

Man, I'm all for exposing wrong doings and having meaningful discussions regarding them. However, when there is a group of people telling you that there was not a rule break, then you need to reevaluate your approach. No one feels attacked, everyone is annoyed with headline posts with little subject. If you don't have a solution or at least are willing to discuss one, don't make the post until then.

Okay? That literally does nothing, even if you had a video. It does nothing.

What rules did he break??? There is no set guideline on what high rebel activity is.

Again, seeing them fly around and do that but not having context is not helpful. Look, if you're flying around in a hawk with 20 people on the server, it ain't cool. However, if you're chasing someone who's in a heli that you found. Then it's totally different. Player count shouldn't restrict as to when a hawk can be pulled, the situation is what allows it's uses.

I think I'm tired of your gang doing nothing other than posting a limited amount of evidence to a concern that you have. I'm tired of your group bringing nothing to the table in regards to adjustments to the rules or even suggestions. If you want to go on the forums and complain about something, you better have an idea on fixing it.

The majority of the players are in your gang. This would be like me bringing something up for a change and only Senior APD +1 it. You've got to politic and sell other people on your opinions or ideas. My concern is that the clip only shows the Ghosthawk being out. Doesn't give context to the situation at hand, nor to how many players were on the server at that time.

So y'all wanted a discussion on this ghosthawk and now you're meming and changing the subject. If this doesn't get back on topic, I'm going to throw this in the category of hoes mad.

Sorry, young buck. Your "joke" just looked like someone starting shit. So I figured I'd respectfully respond back. I forgot that no one makes posts with double meanings!

Keeping the mean streets of Altis safe! Ah, but @Noahhh! brought it into conversation. So I clarified the change that was made. Don't get upset when I clarify something.