Jesse

18 minutes ago, Claysive said:

Lol. Even if it was related to Olympus, it’s just textures. These people are acting like you are selling database access or some shit. It’s a video game. I think many people forget that. 

So selling assets would be fine. What about code, etc. It would precedent setting essentially. Others would then want to do it. Lines would have to be drawn. Also don't necessarily want competition to get it or people wanting to make servers. Having it say you can potentially impact on whether or not your texture is added to the server also isn't right Imo.

20 minutes ago, MAV said:

We can but the problem is a high % of players have their game stats publicly hidden which would trigger false bans

Can easily do the server based off the playtime stored in the array for faction minutes... Arma time, yes. However, most accounts are bought so doing Arma playtime is retarded anyways.

Just now, MAV said:

So this begs the question, why didn't you buy it from dili? I obviously wasn't in on any of the discussions, but with how close you were with dili i gotta believe he came to you first...

@McDili - Did you ask me if I wanted Olympus ever?

To answer it before Dili chimes in though... he never did. The agreement was that we'd both leave together for the most part. Dili wasn't enjoying his time and such. I wasn't necessarily at that very moment either. So we both parted. I don't recall our conversation post leaving. However, it was very quick to ask Peter (Almost in the same hour or two of us talking about leaving on snapchat). I didn't really even consider me getting owner as being on the table. I don't really recall much of it anymore as it's a far thing of the past... 

The first person asked was Peter.

Plus, IF I recall correctly, it was generally said that Peter would be the next owner. I also, did not feel polite/correct asking for owner of it. Had I been offered it I would've taken it, which it wasn't really known to me that I could have had it, had I asked. However, I'm not that type of person to just be "Like hey, step down from owner, give me it, see ya later". Especially when Dili and I said we'd both leave at the same time.

6 hours ago, RDyer216 said:

Is this something that you actually wanted?

I mean... I was Lead Developer? Owner, yeah. I talked with Peter about it almost immediately after he took ownership since I saw the direction... See my status update for more details on that if you care about it.

On 3/25/2019 at 2:42 PM, Ronin said:

pretty sure Jesse took the old GW file with him, which is why this one was severely delayed.

I am owner of said mission file yes. However, when I was asked about it from Fusah i told him to have Peter talk to me if he wants it. I was also told that ikiled was just already just gonna make one or something anyways..

No one ever reached out to me... don't make me sound like a reason of failure here. Had i been approached i would've helped out.

On 2/3/2019 at 1:23 PM, Dante said:

@McDili - From my biggest doubter to my biggest supporter. Olmypus took major leaps with you and Jesse running the server. You both pissed me off with hyour anti APD outlooks later on, but I honestly think it was for the best and you did an excellent job at owner. The best yeller in Olympus History. We still need to meet up for that drink one day my fellow southerner. 
 

Can't even @ a nigga? Solid. Glad you feel the changes that were made were in the interest of the server.

On 2/3/2019 at 1:23 PM, Dante said:

...I am not a fan in the direction that Olympus has been headed under Peter's leadership. I have all the love and respect for Peter, but I just think he was a much better Sr Admin than an Owner.

I sir... could not agree more. Same reason you didn't see me return back in December when I finished up my schooling.

Goodluck with your stuff Dante. I know you put in a ton of ticket hours. Definitely were a major puller of workload in that regard. Feel free to re-add me on SnapChat. Shoot me a msg or something if you want it if you don't remember it.

6 hours ago, xanx said:

cuz they offered him money to be their Dev lmao

Keep talking shit you don't even know.

1 hour ago, codeYeTi said:

You damned well know who could.

Yeah prolly not you.

@Kurt

I honestly think this has always been how my pc was...

11 minutes ago, indian said:

wait... so what actually happened with the servers, website and what not?

Some poor management of disk space. Caused a sql table to become corrupted. Caused the mysql service to not be able to start up or continue running. Several people tried "fixing" her. Then spent a few hours searching documentation, scouring for backups, etc... Eventually had a break through and fixed it.

Gonna help train these guys and inform them a tad on some stuff to hopefully help prevent this issue from ever happening again.

Just now, Aunt Jemima said:

Come out of retirement

Nawh.

1 minute ago, Gf 1 v 24 said:

doesn't actually look to bad but I swear it's been announced a long time ago but no one knows the date of it's release

If it gets released... see my above post.

12 minutes ago, SPBojo said:

@Retired Developer Hit him with it plz thanks

Yeah if you donated prior to McDili taking ownership the funds that were coming in paid for a college edumacation and probably hundreds of pizza rolls. Several games and probably a decent chunk of other stupid shit.

Also word on the street is that identity has actually gone through all their funds (over 1.3m). Hence why they got rid of several dev staff which is true since they're stopping the dev streams. So this is the last hope to generate more revenue to fund the next modules. 

6 hours ago, MAV said:

Actually logically if you zero a scope...

I am well aware. However, the discussion is on Arma not real life. Yes I could've shown a diagram on how a bullet bullet trajectory works but it wouldn't make a difference since we're talking about shooting in 3pp and 1pp in ARMA not real life. So instead of derailing it and talking about something irrelevant or how Arma isnt doing something right yada yada I spoke exactly of how the game works in its current state. Which that in both 1pp and 3pp when shooting closer than your zero the bullet is below the crosshair. I would assume this is because the game draws the crosshair from the sights and not the bore of the firearm or some shit along those lines.

Just now, Fat Clemenza said:

Release...

Capture...

6 minutes ago, Silton said:

i believe not but i do not have my pc to test.

It indeed does shoot low as intended.
https://i.gyazo.com/e46219137d551633190871047c54b0c6.mp4

9 minutes ago, Silton said:

cod is also in 1st person. arma crosshair is accurate in 1st not 3rd

Uh what? It's should also shoot low in first when zero'd at 200m and shooting at 20m. When crosshair is set to static obviously.

Prolly something to do with the zeroing of the weapon in the top right..... 

Almost like the crosshair is zero'd for 200m.

20m =/= 200m

42 minutes ago, Ignis said:

I last about four seconds, why you ask?

Amen. Here to disappoint.

35 minutes ago, McDili said:

Hey I always see you posting on Asylum forums when I'm shitposting on Asylum Forums.

 

Just thought I'd stop by and let you know that when I see Asylum players switch to Olympus I get rock hard

Ditto...

2 minutes ago, Caleb Snackbar said:

Why you take down Olympus discord

Peter didn't want to have it transferred. Gave the kill order.

3 minutes ago, mbpslyr said:

NO FAITH:( its legit ill get a screen shot<3

 

And I'll grab the logs.