The Sovereign

This shit is exactly why it's impossible to hate you. @ Bubbaloo Burrito for community manager.

You are easily one of my favorite staff members.... Don't take this as an attack... It's just a fact. You once banned me for dpi jumping for jumping over a wall with absolutely 0 spinning.

Unless it hit a realtor between when i sold it 6 months ago to now, then its probably still upgraded from when I owned it lol

You are like the weirdest mf. He deleted a lot of fucked up comments after saying them. I never respond unprovoked.

I now see why democracy is bad.

Huuuuuge QOL update. Ty so much for this whole thing basially.. going under the radar no double because its a lot of little things, but great fucking job.

You know theres unique 0-4 craters right? Did you mean 5c or are you really out here for style and pizazz?

I paid 20 for it, and selling it to the realtor woulda got me 15.

House is sold. tyvm

Keep in mind it costs about 23 mil to buy it from the realtor and fully upgrade it so this is a steal.

@ doubleueyeceekay You legend.

Nothing is a bigger insult than being accepted by the Armed Assault 3 Roleplayer community.

TF DID YOU DO TO ME?!?! MY REPUTATION IS RUINED!~!!!

It's physically impossible for any of you to ever have sex with an anime girl. They don't exist.

Waste Management is the only cartel gang you can take seriously anymore.

Racism is bad.

Once upon a time I was approaching almost 800 downvotes. I was living high on the hog. I had it all... houses, cars, downvotes.. you name it. Now things are getting rougher out here. Fact is I'm almost positive reputation. I need you to stop and think what that would mean for Olympus to allow me to be legitimized with a positive reputation. I cannot ask you to downvote me, as that would be in violation of the rules, so I won't. I'm just asking you to do what you feel is right and take a stand.

Supposedly, civ council made this decision. I was in cc at the time it was made and I dont remember a single discussion about this bullshit.

Even as the rule is as you say it is now written and interpreted, which is very very stupid and open to abuse of interpretation, it still should not apply in this situation, because by him going there, he killed ALL OF THE COPS, and had he not, he wouldn't have. Banning him is like banning someone for thinking about doing a crime, even if you believe that was his intention. The end result, is all that matters, and the end result says that was the best tactical play to kill 100% of the cops instead of 90%. But I repeat, he knew that cop was there. And saying he shouldn't have went in the pillbox is literally just saying he wasnt allowed to wipe the cops, just most of them. And saying he had no choice but to spare the cop that was processing his friend to avoid killing his friend.

At least your meme's are better than Jpostman's. That dude just tries to be like a more autistic version of you.

Alternatively, B-lined straight for the only cop that wasn't in his blast radius. and ultimately killed every cop because of it, including the main target, the cop who was processing his gang mate.

Still. They spent 600k on a vest and killed a guy with a 100k bounty because they were having fun, and a rule got completely twisted around to ban him when you guys lost like 10k a piece in what should have been a completely legal suivest detonation. I reiterate Mr Karma, I like you. But it's hard to make an argument you weren't being a petty dick here. We ALL are sometimes. I get it. But you were. And this player report somehow skated by when it shouldn't have.

You also asked for 500k comp. For what? Your cop kit? His friend with the 100k bounty that died? We all get in moods like that sometimes, I'm not trying to be mean. I'm actually glad you tried to extort my friend because this is something that needed to be cleared up about the rules anyways and I'm confident someone's gonna make this right.

Well it's too gray to be allowed and it got a longstanding and active member of the community banned over something that was clearly against the spirit of the rule. "No Reason" has always been interpreted as 'without killing someone you are properly engaged with." It should stay like that so that upset people can't just make a case that presumes someones motives. His actions of going back to that pillbox resulted in the death of one more cop than there would have been had he not. Not only was it one more cop, but it was the cop that was actively processing his friend, thus, the prime target in the first place. @ David Miller I respectfully ask that you take this situation into account in its entirety and reevaluate your decision. I believe you made the wrong call in this situation and it opens a pandora's box to a lot of really stupid bans in the future.

There was a cop in that pillbox trying to send his friend to jail. He had the best possible reason. This ban never should have happened and it's ridiculously pushing the line back far enough that it's going to result in a lot of really stupid bans in the future.