Pseudonym

the sovereign is MY waifu! not yours!

yo @ Frog Legs if you keep this up you might lose an entire quarter of your olympus follower base

I will once more attempt to reach out to, what I hope is, your love of Jesus Christ and copy paste the last paragraph of my previous message: On a more serious note, if you are a christian as your steam profile would imply, I'd implore you to stop engaging with people like this, or with like how I am engaging with you. What benefit could be so great from insulting your fellow man, as we are doing to each other, if it costs us our soul? Do you really want to be so hateful in your heart? Jesus Christ might love you, but how could you love Jesus Christ if you are so hateful and desire no change? When you set your name to what it is, when you troll people on Olympus, when you publicly show hatred to other people, do you believe that is what God wants for you? Would God tell you: "Go, troll random people on the internet, use vulgar language!"? Or if he could, would he tell you to change your ways before it is to late? If you do something sinful because you genuinely think it is OK, and not sinful, that's one thing. But when you know something is sinful, and you just ignore that it's a sin, and you keep doing it anyway without any plans to change it, that is when you are going directly against God's will, in a very insidious way. Please, consult with God and with Jesus Christ about whether this is the path you want to take in life or not.

As an Olympus Culture Warrior, I'm gonna have to downvote everything Anti-Sov people say and upvote all the Pro-Sov comments. I watched some The-Sovereign videos and they seemed like they made sense to me.

I WAS USING THAT BUG!

Everything you say I have already predicted. My message analyzed your psyche perfectly, there was never any doubt about whether or not you would be able to read it. Your only capability is to get a feeling of a message through the PNG. You are a different form of life, you are only theoretically intelligent, not practically intelligent. You are an exact model of an inverse ancient human. Where as had only understanding of the practical, you have only the capability to theoretically interpret things through feelings. That's why you have never been able to criticize a point anyone has ever made, because you don't know what point they made, you just have the feeling that they made a point that you are unable to understand, so you attack the fact that a point was made. You are incapable of facts and logic. So when you encountered a factual dissertation of yourself, all you are left with is defending yourself emotionally because you know of nothing more, even though the dissertation never used emotion to begin with. It's the equivalent of seeing a fire burning in your house, and instead of using water to attempt to stop it, or fire to make it burn it's self out so it is unable to progress, you yell at it and act as though that would get it to stop. When greeted by practical and logical arguments, you fall back only to theoretical and emotional forms of rhetoric, you are incapable of practical thought. On a more serious note, if you are a christian as your steam profile would imply, I'd implore you to stop engaging with people like this, or with like how I am engaging with you. What benefit could be so great from insulting your fellow man, as we are doing to each other, if it costs us our soul? Do you really want to be so hateful in your heart? Jesus Christ might love you, but how could you love Jesus Christ if you are so hateful and desire no change?

As I said.

I have come to a tentative hypothesis that this subject is incapable of reading text in an HTML format, it appears as though his ability to "read" and "comprehend" text is not the same as any other form of intelligent life. Where as literate person would be able to decipher a sentence by individually reading the letters, then combining those into a word, repeated multiple times as to understand the structure of a sentence. It appears this life form is incapable of such a process for certain media formats. When presented with HTML based text it shows no evidence of being able to comprehend what was said, but when that format is converted into a PNG image, it is able to mock the underlying text of the image. I propose that this could be evidence for how the ancestors of humans first developed intelligence, rather than using a hierarchical structure of knowledge like all other forms of known intelligent life, this being seems only capable of the "feelings" of intelligence, rather than understand something, it gets the "vibe" off of it. Where a normal person would "comprehend", this entity would "experience". To use a more concrete example: Modern humans would be able to understand the concept of a ship both from seeing it in real life, and from seeing it's theoretical abstraction in the form of a painting. But perhaps our ancient ancestors would have been able to understand a ship if they saw it in person, but if their only exposure to it was a painting, they would have no understanding of it, as their neurons were not designed for abstractions, but for as is. They would simply see a canvas, with different materials imbued into it, rather than make sense of how the ink forms into the ocean, and a ship. They lacked the "Theory" and only the "Practical". This could explain why the oldest cave paintings are 40,000 years old, perhaps that is when humans evolved the capability to combine their preexisting practical intelligence, with a new form of theoretical intelligence. In the case of cave paintings, where as before they were only able to understand a buffalo if they saw a buffalo, now they gained the ability to understand a buffalo from the theoretical description of a buffalo as well. They gained practical intelligence and theoretical intelligence. Yet with our given test subject, he seems as if he is ONLY able to understand the theoretical, not the practical. In the case of the online: He can't understand HTML (The real, the practical), yet is only able to "feel" PNG (The theoretical). That is to say, it is my proposal that he is a creature with only theoretical intelligence. Where a modern person can understand a ship, and the painting of a ship, and an ancient person can only understand a ship, and not the painting of a ship, perhaps this test subject would be unable to understand a ship if he saw it in person, but would be able to understand the feeling of a ship if he saw it as a painting. To use more website based examples: This subject appears unable to understand HTML, yet is able to "feel" PNG. Perhaps by studying a form of life without any practical intelligence, and only theoretical intelligence, we can come to further understand how these two forms of intelligence differ from each other, and we can come to understand how prehistoric humans eventually managed to develop theoretical intelligence along with their practical intelligence.

Yes, I understand you are incapable of education or learning. If you unlocked the ability to read sentences consecutively then you would have the literary depth necessary to know this is already implied simply from your name, and the lack of intelligence as is apparent from your messaging. Alas, the sentence that explained this was sadly 2 sentences deep into a 3 sentence paragraph, so the chance you will be able to read the explanation is exactly zero in your current state, or perhaps the prospect of hidden knowledge just one sentence further into a message will force you brain to evolve and adapt to changing circumstances, thus giving the ability to read an entire paragraph.

dude i've fucked up yarv so hard he's actually trash. legit in one of the games i played with him he's like "is this texas holdem poker or poker?" and i'm like bro are you retarded. he's actually a free kill for whoever is matched with him lmao

I, as well, in this message, insult you without engaging with the meaning of your message.

Look at it? Of course, you only "look at things". Someone handed you a book. You didn't read it, you "looked" at it. You don't even know how to read this message I'm writing. You look and feel, just as my original message said, your canvas serves zero purpose because you are unable to even read it yourself.

ryan and -dante- messages are all we needed in the end. thread closed. don't respond anymore because it's all solved.

yeah but then why are there 8000 people playing it and 10000 playing reforger? like it doesn't matter what you think, it matters what players think. and there is a solid 8000 still in arma 3

theres tons of people who wouldn't be interested in playing reforger olympus, and only want to play arma 3 olympus, if you take a step back you lose those current people for the chance of gaining new people, so like either way you lose a3 players, so why would you do that? if you have enough devs, then you can start working on a3 and reforger at the same time

@ David Miller the Ifrit thing being in context to APD now makes a lot more sense. And I 100% agree that it would be a debate nightmare if it was a rule change, and turning gray area rules into game mechanics instead is very good. Most of my problems with the rules on any RP server is that your basically trying to cram game mechanics into RP systems (like text messages, or talking to people). That's why wars are nice because it turns killing into a game mechanic rather than RP. So yeah if you could solve stuff like rotor tapping with game mechanics, instead of forcing the players to act like a game mechanic exists when it doesn't that is peak.

Lord -dante- has spoken. Brother @ Blackout2991 , I feel as though this means we are all considered guilty under the light of -dante-. Perhaps when we refer to Dante, we are referring to our sins, and our guilt, when we refer to -dante-, we refer to the good in us that attempts to fight the evil. I believe that Dante is in my heart, but I also believe I must strive for -dante-. I have a theory for how to kill him with it being perfectly legal.

This capitalized D, non hyphen version you speak of is clearly the name given to those he deemed guilty and punished, brother, stay pure, do not allow yourself to fall to the level of the damned, refer to our good -dante- with dignity, and with his proper name. Praise -dante-.

I can't necessarily disagree with the gay part, but there are so many more genuinely worse words you could have used to describe it, and you settle on gay? Either you agree with all the shit they did, in which case get a tattoo of them, or you haven't read shit about what they did, in which case your in no position to comment. They literally got multiple gods of war, god of the sky, and god of the s ea. Ya know what, fuck it. You should tattoo yourself, NOW, with some random ass olympic logo that has no real place on your body, just floating in nowhereness. Go on, get it, get that fucking tattoo. You don't deserve a better tattoo, you don't deserve a beautiful canvas where you can sense your tattoos coming to life, see their interactions, watch them move with you on a day to day life. No, you should save that ink for someone who cares. Your body isn't a beautiful canvas, its the table for a hedonistic orgy with no care for the future, it's the canvas of a drunkard, and if you had any idea about greek mythology you would know the perfect god you could get tattooed right now, but you don't TYS, now, and give that ink. Your skin is a worthless bitch as canvas. Your skin is as valuable as a summer ant, I'm gonna stop you, u keep coming back, i'm gonna poison you, you keep coming back why? because you want the ink, u worthless bitch ass canvas. your gonna stay on my dick until you die, you serve no purpose with tattoos, your purpose with ink is to ruin your skin daily, your purpose with ink is to be in this forum blowing a dick daily, your skin is NOTHING, it serves ZERO PURPOSE, you should INK YOUR SELF, NOW! and give someone else a piece of that canvas space, so they can get a tattoo that actually means something in this blue trap bubble. Cuz what are you here for? To worship a gaming server? Tattoo yourself. I mean that with 100%, with 1000%

yo anychance i can get 1 more reaction today so i can react sobs?

ok ok thanks for the context, I have a generally positive view of Treebeard, and a generally negative view of brown name dude, but i'll pay attention and keep your words in mind

I do not believe driving off road is illegal. I re-read the ticket guide chapter on traffic offenses and the closest thing I could see is reckless driving, which notes/examples says: "Add if a suspect is driving a car in a manner that endangers the public or themselves."

yo can u explain me the drama here? i'm kinda confused with this interaction chain. From what I can tell: goodideabadimplementation trash talks treebeard, then treebeard trashtalks goodideabaimplmentation, then you are trash talking EITHER treebeard OR goodideabadimplementation, I assume ur trash talking goodideabadimplementation but i'm not 100% sure