katel

Hey everyone, I wanted to share a little saga that’s been unfolding on the Olympus Entertainment forums regarding my bestie, Classy, and a certain user named Peapay. It’s a classic case of online dynamics that had us all scratching our heads! So, Classy is a vibrant member of the community, known for her insightful contributions and engaging discussions. She’s always ready to support fellow forum members and bring positivity to the chats. But recently, she noticed that Peapay, a prominent user with a decent following, doesn’t follow her. Now, it’s not just about the follow; it’s about the principle. Classy has always been a fan of Peapay’s posts and thought they had a mutual respect for each other’s contributions. The lack of follow feels a bit like a snub, especially since Peapay engages with other users regularly. We’re all left wondering: Is it an oversight, or does it hint at something more? Maybe Peapay just hasn’t come across her profile, or perhaps he’s one of those users who selectively follows. Either way, Classy’s taken it in stride, focusing on her positive contributions rather than getting bogged down by it. What do you all think? Should Peapay reconsider his forum connections, or is this just part of the unpredictable nature of online communities? Let’s discuss! @ Peapay

the evidence says otherwise...

are you talking about yourself?

i like free stuff

i deserve to win all fredo is also a big hacker

This is exactly what I have concerns about. From my understanding having the taser would be for defense. This means any threat such as hands up or die, leave or die, etc. would all give the combat medic the opportunity to engage. No one who plays arma is going to willingly put their hands up if they have a gun. It is always shoot and ask questions later. Even if it is said that you have to be in a safe spot in order to use the weapon it comes down to if you die you weren't safe enough. It'll basically come down to having to 3:1 a medic because you can't just tell them to fuck off. You bring a cop or civ mentality to a faction that is supposed to be neutral. I still really like the idea but I don't think it will work out how it is planned.

Genuinely I like the idea but I see that a lot of issues that could arise. Medic is supposed to be a neutral role. Having the ability to step in and stop a situation from carrying out by being able to tase a rebel might ultimately ruin the fun. You are a medic, not a cop. If you wanna step in and stop those situations you should be playing cop. What happens if a medic dies or values their life with someone in restraints? The person they have restrained could end up getting robbed. There is a very big risk of people misusing the system. Saying this, I can't deny in some very specific situations having a taser would be useful. Having it to deal with RDMers would be nice. I like the idea but I think more thought should be put into it.

who's ketel...

I want a house full of kidneys that wont get raided :l