Pseudonym

I have come to a tentative hypothesis that this subject is incapable of reading text in an HTML format, it appears as though his ability to "read" and "comprehend" text is not the same as any other form of intelligent life. Where as literate person would be able to decipher a sentence by individually reading the letters, then combining those into a word, repeated multiple times as to understand the structure of a sentence. It appears this life form is incapable of such a process for certain media formats. When presented with HTML based text it shows no evidence of being able to comprehend what was said, but when that format is converted into a PNG image, it is able to mock the underlying text of the image. I propose that this could be evidence for how the ancestors of humans first developed intelligence, rather than using a hierarchical structure of knowledge like all other forms of known intelligent life, this being seems only capable of the "feelings" of intelligence, rather than understand something, it gets the "vibe" off of it. Where a normal person would "comprehend", this entity would "experience". To use a more concrete example: Modern humans would be able to understand the concept of a ship both from seeing it in real life, and from seeing it's theoretical abstraction in the form of a painting. But perhaps our ancient ancestors would have been able to understand a ship if they saw it in person, but if their only exposure to it was a painting, they would have no understanding of it, as their neurons were not designed for abstractions, but for as is. They would simply see a canvas, with different materials imbued into it, rather than make sense of how the ink forms into the ocean, and a ship. They lacked the "Theory" and only the "Practical". This could explain why the oldest cave paintings are 40,000 years old, perhaps that is when humans evolved the capability to combine their preexisting practical intelligence, with a new form of theoretical intelligence. In the case of cave paintings, where as before they were only able to understand a buffalo if they saw a buffalo, now they gained the ability to understand a buffalo from the theoretical description of a buffalo as well. They gained practical intelligence and theoretical intelligence. Yet with our given test subject, he seems as if he is ONLY able to understand the theoretical, not the practical. In the case of the online: He can't understand HTML (The real, the practical), yet is only able to "feel" PNG (The theoretical). That is to say, it is my proposal that he is a creature with only theoretical intelligence. Where a modern person can understand a ship, and the painting of a ship, and an ancient person can only understand a ship, and not the painting of a ship, perhaps this test subject would be unable to understand a ship if he saw it in person, but would be able to understand the feeling of a ship if he saw it as a painting. To use more website based examples: This subject appears unable to understand HTML, yet is able to "feel" PNG. Perhaps by studying a form of life without any practical intelligence, and only theoretical intelligence, we can come to further understand how these two forms of intelligence differ from each other, and we can come to understand how prehistoric humans eventually managed to develop theoretical intelligence along with their practical intelligence.

Yes, I understand you are incapable of education or learning. If you unlocked the ability to read sentences consecutively then you would have the literary depth necessary to know this is already implied simply from your name, and the lack of intelligence as is apparent from your messaging. Alas, the sentence that explained this was sadly 2 sentences deep into a 3 sentence paragraph, so the chance you will be able to read the explanation is exactly zero in your current state, or perhaps the prospect of hidden knowledge just one sentence further into a message will force you brain to evolve and adapt to changing circumstances, thus giving the ability to read an entire paragraph.

dude i've fucked up yarv so hard he's actually trash. legit in one of the games i played with him he's like "is this texas holdem poker or poker?" and i'm like bro are you retarded. he's actually a free kill for whoever is matched with him lmao

I, as well, in this message, insult you without engaging with the meaning of your message.

Look at it? Of course, you only "look at things". Someone handed you a book. You didn't read it, you "looked" at it. You don't even know how to read this message I'm writing. You look and feel, just as my original message said, your canvas serves zero purpose because you are unable to even read it yourself.

ryan and -dante- messages are all we needed in the end. thread closed. don't respond anymore because it's all solved.

yeah but then why are there 8000 people playing it and 10000 playing reforger? like it doesn't matter what you think, it matters what players think. and there is a solid 8000 still in arma 3

theres tons of people who wouldn't be interested in playing reforger olympus, and only want to play arma 3 olympus, if you take a step back you lose those current people for the chance of gaining new people, so like either way you lose a3 players, so why would you do that? if you have enough devs, then you can start working on a3 and reforger at the same time

@ David Miller the Ifrit thing being in context to APD now makes a lot more sense. And I 100% agree that it would be a debate nightmare if it was a rule change, and turning gray area rules into game mechanics instead is very good. Most of my problems with the rules on any RP server is that your basically trying to cram game mechanics into RP systems (like text messages, or talking to people). That's why wars are nice because it turns killing into a game mechanic rather than RP. So yeah if you could solve stuff like rotor tapping with game mechanics, instead of forcing the players to act like a game mechanic exists when it doesn't that is peak.

Lord -dante- has spoken. Brother @ Blackout2991 , I feel as though this means we are all considered guilty under the light of -dante-. Perhaps when we refer to Dante, we are referring to our sins, and our guilt, when we refer to -dante-, we refer to the good in us that attempts to fight the evil. I believe that Dante is in my heart, but I also believe I must strive for -dante-. I have a theory for how to kill him with it being perfectly legal.

This capitalized D, non hyphen version you speak of is clearly the name given to those he deemed guilty and punished, brother, stay pure, do not allow yourself to fall to the level of the damned, refer to our good -dante- with dignity, and with his proper name. Praise -dante-.

I can't necessarily disagree with the gay part, but there are so many more genuinely worse words you could have used to describe it, and you settle on gay? Either you agree with all the shit they did, in which case get a tattoo of them, or you haven't read shit about what they did, in which case your in no position to comment. They literally got multiple gods of war, god of the sky, and god of the s ea. Ya know what, fuck it. You should tattoo yourself, NOW, with some random ass olympic logo that has no real place on your body, just floating in nowhereness. Go on, get it, get that fucking tattoo. You don't deserve a better tattoo, you don't deserve a beautiful canvas where you can sense your tattoos coming to life, see their interactions, watch them move with you on a day to day life. No, you should save that ink for someone who cares. Your body isn't a beautiful canvas, its the table for a hedonistic orgy with no care for the future, it's the canvas of a drunkard, and if you had any idea about greek mythology you would know the perfect god you could get tattooed right now, but you don't TYS, now, and give that ink. Your skin is a worthless bitch as canvas. Your skin is as valuable as a summer ant, I'm gonna stop you, u keep coming back, i'm gonna poison you, you keep coming back why? because you want the ink, u worthless bitch ass canvas. your gonna stay on my dick until you die, you serve no purpose with tattoos, your purpose with ink is to ruin your skin daily, your purpose with ink is to be in this forum blowing a dick daily, your skin is NOTHING, it serves ZERO PURPOSE, you should INK YOUR SELF, NOW! and give someone else a piece of that canvas space, so they can get a tattoo that actually means something in this blue trap bubble. Cuz what are you here for? To worship a gaming server? Tattoo yourself. I mean that with 100%, with 1000%

yo anychance i can get 1 more reaction today so i can react sobs?

ok ok thanks for the context, I have a generally positive view of Treebeard, and a generally negative view of brown name dude, but i'll pay attention and keep your words in mind

I do not believe driving off road is illegal. I re-read the ticket guide chapter on traffic offenses and the closest thing I could see is reckless driving, which notes/examples says: "Add if a suspect is driving a car in a manner that endangers the public or themselves."

yo can u explain me the drama here? i'm kinda confused with this interaction chain. From what I can tell: goodideabadimplementation trash talks treebeard, then treebeard trashtalks goodideabaimplmentation, then you are trash talking EITHER treebeard OR goodideabadimplementation, I assume ur trash talking goodideabadimplementation but i'm not 100% sure

You're 20. It's normal to get stupid tattoos at this age, but I wouldn't get a tattoo for a server you could literally get perm banned off of. If you REALLY want a tattoo for something related to Olympus, make it related to greek mythology. Watch the fuckin ted eds on greek mythology and see if there is something that relates to you, then get a tattoo related to that if you really want to.

What does that idea have to do with the APD? The idea is saying no more insurance on ifrits. If it blows up it dies forever, removed from garage, also if you seize it, it also dies forever, removed from garage. Why does it matter that the APD is unable to blow up or deinsure a vehicle? The affect on APD would be that there are less ifrits for them to have to fight, and that people use them less often. I feel like this should probably be rewritten something like: "Intentionally rotor tapping an illegal aerial vehicle against an object (E.g: Wall, ground, telephone pole) so that even if it is repaired it can not be flown again". Why doesn't this apply to all illegal aerial vehicles? Why doesn't something like this apply to ALL vehicles if it's the same as water logging? Questions for how it is currently written: Does this only apply if the pilot of the ghosthawk rotor taps the ghosthawk they are flying? Or does this also apply to someone else rotor tapping a ghosthawk? Does this apply to the armed Huron? Does this also apply to an armed plane, but moving it around so that it's impossible to take off again?

I have not proclaimed to our God using a false name in much time, yet today was the first straw in the effigy of our Lord, -dante-. When I was informed of our lord's careless nature as to the life of his underlings, I understood as even the most infallible God must focus their attention on certain things from time to time, yet when I found he ignored evidence from a dispute, the appeal of an innocent man, and only on the second appeal was the right course of action taken. I cried. I cried out to -dante- using a false name, I cried to myself, I cried for my brethren fallen from inexcusable carelessness. It WAS my believe that -dante- was unable to make mistakes when he decided not to, yet I can not say a scenario where he would decide to make a mistake. My loyalty to -dante- is as such that even in the face of this evidence, I believe there must be yet other reasons for his actions. Perhaps it is a test of faith on his loyal subjects, he knew I would be informed of this and questioned whether I would fight for what is right, for the principles of -dante- or would I fight only for -dante-? And it is with this I must say: My loyalty is not to -dante-, but it is to what -dante- believes in. And it is with this anger that I see my Lord repeatedly strike an innocent man under false pretexts, that I must shout in vain, all caps, no hyphens: DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNTTTEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE! WWWWHHHHHHHHHHHHHHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!

It appears your wish is coming true.

Don't worry The Sovereign! I'm on the counter offensive! we getting u back to a 1 upvote down vote ratio within a month!

@ Zeuse LAY DOWN YOUR EMOJIS! ENTER THE RING OF TEXTUAL COMBAT LIKE A MAN!

@ Zeuse Please, show us why you are the "lead" in lead map designer, and lead with your words, not simple 24x24 pixel images.