Rule question

[Exner21 48]

We recently had an incident to where a cop was driving on the main road. He ran into us and we got out and 3v1 him. But we where told to let him go because he was responding to a pharma. Rules don't say "responding" it states "at". Should we have let him go? or Nah? Opinions on the scenario?

The rule quote - Members of the APD may not be restrained or excessively tased at Federal Reserves, Blackwater, Jail, or Pharmaceutical/Bank events.

[Dank MeeMoo 193]

If a cop is obviously attempting to respond to the pharma you shouldn’t 3-1 them as they are still part of the pharmaceutical situation.

[ThatNerdyGuy 5914]

24 minutes ago, Dank MeeMoo said:

If a cop is obviously attempting to respond to the pharma you shouldn’t 3-1 them as they are still part of the pharmaceutical situation.

 

[i win 1096]

I'm wondering where you ran into him and what direction he was going.

[mohsen98 94]

7 hours ago, Exner21 said:

We recently had an incident to where a cop was driving on the main road. He ran into us and we got out and 3v1 him. But we where told to let him go because he was responding to a pharma. Rules don't say "responding" it states "at". Should we have let him go? or Nah? Opinions on the scenario?

The rule quote - Members of the APD may not be restrained or excessively tased at Federal Reserves, Blackwater, Jail, or Pharmaceutical/Bank events.

bull sheet rule

[Exner21 48]

6 hours ago, Mr Majestic said:

I'm wondering where you ran into him and what direction he was going.

It was just north of the 100% drop