GangPlay 243 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 So after reading into this "scandal" that lead to @G.O.A.T. removal, It seems to me as if he was receiving info from other staff members which is supposedly frowned upon. Yet they turn around and give an Admin Chief so now he can just give himself the information instead of having someone give it to him. It also seems as to me if there is a snitching son of a Bitch in the staff that was just jealous and wanted to fuck someone else over by creating allegations or come clean, no matter that person wanted to fuck him over to further himself within the ranks and tarnish someones reputation. #FuckSnitches 1 11 Quote Link to comment
Pledge 2291 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 10 minutes ago, GangPlay said: So after reading into this "scandal" that lead to @G.O.A.T. removal, It seems to me as if he was receiving info from other staff members which is supposedly frowned upon. Yet they turn around and give an Admin Chief so now he can just give himself the information instead of having someone give it to him. It also seems as to me if there is a snitching son of a Bitch in the staff that was just jealous and wanted to fuck someone else over by creating allegations or come clean, no matter that person wanted to fuck him over to further himself within the ranks and tarnish someones reputation. #FuckSnitches The problem the staff had was not the snitching itself, but the chief rewarding people for snitching. Quote Link to comment
Bocaj 111 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 There is nothing wrong with an admin being the chief. @TheCmdrRex is a suitable candidate for this position because he intends on ensuring that his place in the staff does not interfere with his new position as Chief of police. From my interactions with him and from what I've seen him say on the forms, he seems to have good ethics and helps whomever has a problem/question, and he's dedicated to APD. These qualities make him more than qualified in my opinion. Quote Link to comment
GangPlay 243 Posted January 23, 2018 Author Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 22 minutes ago, Pledge said: The problem the staff had was not the snitching itself, but the chief rewarding people for snitching. So we reward the guy that snitched on the chief by giving him chief. So i mean if he was booted for rewarding snitching are they not doing the same thing 1 Quote Link to comment
Mustache 232 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 It doesn’t matter. What happened happened. Rewarding snitches to abuse his rank to get people removed from the SAPD is no doubt childish. I love you GOAT, but this is downright stupid. Quote Link to comment
Snare 2687 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 But he stated that goodman kept his rank for other reasons not for snitching. A lot of what I'm seeing is a lot of allegations with no support being thrown around honestly. Quote Link to comment
gomby 22 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 9 minutes ago, GangPlay said: So we reward the guy that snitched on the chief by giving him chief. So i mean if he was booted for rewarding snitching are they not doing the same thing You would benefit from some readings on introductory ethics. 2 3 Quote Link to comment
ScreaM 1763 Posted January 23, 2018 Report Share Posted January 23, 2018 1 hour ago, GangPlay said: and give an Admin Chief so now he can just give himself the information 2 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.