Fat Clemenza

There ya go.

Tier 5

Are you back, bro?

God's Holy Trousers our gang funds exploded overnight! Is that just from the cartels?

Try your hand at cocaine. The field and processor are located in the vicinity of Sofia.

Ghostface had to buy his MXC two or three times yesterday. I guess what happens is if you're KIA, someone can scroll wheel the weapon off of your body and you'll spawn without that weapon. That's a huge problem considering the MXC is $136K AFTER the 20% discount for Tier 5 donators. I've heard a few cops say that they'll not play until this bug is fixed. Now, the big question is this: is it a bug or is it intentional?

Any other $250 donators experiencing a problem where you're only getting things for 20% off and lower paychecks? Can confirm that Gucci and myself are having this problem.

I'd give it a chance if I were you, dude. Olympus has a really good gig going and you'll start fresh with the rest of us. If you went to another AL server, you'd start fresh and would be at the mercy of whatever big gangs run those servers. Now, if all you want to do is write dissenting opinions about the wipe on the forums, then go right ahead. Just be aware that you're in the minority and because of that, you'll be debating nonstop with other people. It'd be wise to professionally express your opinions to keep things civil as I see this turning into a pissing contest very soon should you continue on your current path.

Oh no, that's not the message I was trying to convey. I was using Doc as an example that spelling and grammar aren't indicative of maturity/performance.

Doctor James is a Corporal and an R&R Coordinator. Have you seen his posts? That's all I'll say, haha!! And this is what happens when you get promoted to Cpl and you try to use those lethals for the first time. http://i.imgur.com/5Q4W70Y.gif For those of you who don't know, that's Hugh Laurie 10-15 years before he was on House.

Will the server that you want us to play on the 20th be updated already?

You think so? I'd have thought he'd listen to this... at least when he's on a stakeout or something of that nature. http://youtu.be/_CHjYHwNzx0

Ooohhh that's very pretty, Jen. I like that much more than the grey and black livery.

You pillock.

Yes

I've had several instances where I submit a ticket at 0 Dark 30 and the player is banned within a few hours. Thanks [OS]!

BBBBRRRUUUHHHH.

Wow. I had no idea either. I guess I'll air on the side of caution while pursuing them from now on. How much do they cost fully upgraded?

Super Bowl XLV was won by the Packers four years ago. Today's Super Bowl is Super Bowl XLIX. Looks like all bets are off now. I'm hoping the Seahawks can hold off the Deflatriots today.

Cheers to you as well, dude. Hope to play with you soon.

1) The MXC is more than capable of making a long distance shot. It can make a 300 meter shot with ease; most hostage situations that I've been in; the marksman is usually no further than 300 meters in an attempt to ensure precision. 2) While cops may "never purposely fail negotiations" they will try to low-ball or stall the guy like you said. With the current regulations, I don't see where this takes you since it's not a failed negotiation which does not warrant force. 3) While the objective is to keep people safe, that end can be reached if we have the opportunity to apprehend the bad guy. This means failing the negotiation in most circumstances. The goal here is not killing anyone; it's to bring the bad guy to Justice while seeing the hostage get out safely. 4) Failing negotiations is part of RP. I could stall negotiations with the intent to fail them in order to resolve the situation. I don't "kill just because I can." If it's possible, then we detain the bad guys and rescue the good guys, like you said. However, in order for us to acheive that end, negotiations will have to fail in order for us to stay within the rules. That's the big problem. Negotiations should not have to fail in order for us to use force. That's my big beef at the moment. I've given my view, I shall stick by it. I'll continue to do what works best for me so long as I'm well within the rules. I appreciate your feedback, Wrice. You've got a solid point of view that I can appreciate, but I wanted to offer mine, no matter how unpopular it is. Maybe the rules might change and the guidelines will be in the middle ground between our points of view.

I have to disagree. Taking down criminals is the job of the police department. If I'm the negotiator and I've got a good guy behind the trigger who's got his sights on that monster of a criminal who made the mistake of violating a person's unalienable rights that were endowed to him by the Creator, then I'll do everything in my power (so long as I know I can keep the hostage alive) to take down the hostage taker. If that means being a used car salesman and saying no to a demand for even the smallest item, then so be it. We RP as cops: once the police sniper is informed of what's going with the situation, then he'll make his move; if he's got a shot on the hostage taker, he'll damn well take the shot. He's not going to wait for "negotiations to fail," in order to take a shot. If he did do that, then at least two people die; the hostage and the hostage taker. At this juncture our Hostage Situations are so one-sided [in the favor of the bad guys] it defies description. I can justify purposely failing a negotiation through RP (by saying no to their demands and having a sniper take down the hostage taker and having an entry team move in to apprehend. I did it in Kavala the other day and it worked spectacularly), so to go back to your post, it's the absolute best thing I could've said. Rant Over.