MAV

lol

i have like 50 pairs... whats your price my guy

i mean in the initial update notes like when it went from 200k to 600k put a note for it being temporary until lethal payout system is fixed or something... doesnt matter whose to blame... it just appears the corp, specifically, are upset with the change, which means the change to 600K seems to of been portrayed as a buff, not a hotfix until the issue with lethal money was resolved. didnt mean to call the devs specifically out.. just when server mechanic changes are made, the devs typically control how that change is portrayed to the player-base in posts such as this one.

Maybe the fail is in the devs not telling Corps+ that lethal money is only being TEMPORARILY increased to 600k until lethal payout is fixed.

Here you go my dude: - Square Cash - Venmo - Google Wallet - PayPal (though not working for you) - Chase QuickPay https://lifehacker.com/five-best-ways-to-send-money-to-other-people-online-1707846074

cant cap without a weapon so really its like 5 KM from capping (2.5 to Rebel then 2.5 back to arms) :-)

enemy gang member has the opportunity to run and take cover... hide...etc... its common sense my dude

Didn't you like just buy that?

As a cop you can taze indefinitely within reason... ie. as long as your actively trying to get a restrain on the man (can't do it to troll) As a civ/vigi - 3 times and done... vigi or not, enemy gang member or not. (to my understanding)

I've explained the reason why, I've explained whether its breaking the rules or not... its no longer a grey area... you keep asking why... why is because this is NOT irl...there is balancing...next time kill the cops before the restrain your enemy gang member or kill them before they get tased.. A good reason for this rule is also - for instance i am war with 80+ gangs... if i could shoot enemy gang members in restraints i would just camp kavala HQ and kill all enemy gang members APD brings in. There are many other reasons why as well. There doesn't always need to be a why for there to be a rule. This thread is not to hash out the methodology and reasoning behind WHY its a rule, its to clarify what is allowed and what is not.

im done arguing this point... go ahead and shoot people your at war with in restraints... and ill see you after your vacation...

you ever jump through a broken window? you get cut the fuck up... its not an intended game mechanic... rules clearly state if your exploiting/glitching (which thats a glitch) to gain a tactical advantage (break into someones house without them getting notified) then its bannable. If you do it to evade/escape its bannable. If you do it for shits and giggles and gain no advantage, its not... its like super jumping onto buildings...its fine, as long as its not to gain an advantage.

Role play - Im jumping on this trampoline, then super jump on a building... still gonna get you banned... RP can only get you so far.... RP im a robot so, using an aimbot should be allowed right? sure but its the cops that tased them (would have killed them) not you, now if you kill them before the cops restrain them your clear...

i mean i think this is not true at all, but the fact is that enemy member is now unable to defend themselves... should have killed them before the cops got them... there is a reason why an enemy gang members name no longer appears red once in restraints...its to help with this confusion.

this is an RP light server, cant kill an enemy gang member (or anyone) in restraints... unless....its....cross....fire............. with the police or someone around them

if your taking someone in restraints your responsible for releasing them safely... if your intent is to kidnap someone from the cops to kill them, they are your hostage now... you must then release them in a safe manor from my understanding if you jump through a window to get into a locked house that is exploiting to gain an unfair tactical advantage

you memer - if your concerned of it getting robbed call apd or R&r to have it impounded otherwise, not your problem

Yes that is still considered fail RP - its basically an assisted combat log No - in this case you are taking someone APD has captures, just because you unrestrain them, engage, taze and restrain them doesnt mean they are no longer APD's suspect. This would be considered Vigi abuse. Yes - this is still robbing technically robbing the player.

yes - its not an intended mechanic and gave you a tactical advantage

What @McDili and all staff are saying is this: - If you shoot at some scrub in Kavala with a rook without engagement and miss, they return fire, then you kill them, that is RDM for skirting rules - If you shoot at someone tires WHILE THEY ARE IN VEHICLE without engagement, and they get out and shoot at you, and you kill them, that is RDM for skirting rules The reason is this, you initiated shooting at them without RP. The fact that its a car or tires is irrelevant, its the fact you fired 'reasonable' at them and then killed them without engagement. There is NO BAN for 'Attempted RDM' - however the player you attempted to RDM is allowed to defend themselves...if you continue to shoot at them, your initial engagement was against the rules, therefor until the engagement is over (5 mins of no exchange of fire or chase) you are NOT allowed to kill them since your part in the engagement was initiated by breaking rules... ________ Think of it this way (this analogy is for @Dante ) In hockey - if i cross the blue line (engagement) before the puck, I am offsides (or breaking the rules), but I am ok, as long as i or my teammates don't touch the puck until i cross back over the blue line (engagement over). Then I am allowed to cross the blue line again and attack the puck (engage) within the rules.

RIP @Homicide @MrBoonie - 1 @Homicide - 1