incompetent admins AGAIN

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

Make it make sense. Tank event. Guy shoots my tank and disables it before the event starts. I kill him when he gets out of the tank. I receive a ban and he does not 

Ban was for event disruption btw. I think disabling my tank before the event starts would be disruption 

[proud 3733]

when in doubt, blame @ -dante-  (only joke ily)

[Rexo 958]

It’s always #blamemilo

 

 

@ Milo

[-dante- 5342]

7 minutes ago, proud said:

when in doubt, blame @ -dante-  (only joke ily)

 

you’re not super off it’s just not my ban this time ;D

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

1 minute ago, -dante- said:

 

you’re not super off it’s just not my ban this time ;D

If it was your ban I wouldn’t have gotten a reduction at all. Your a shit admin 

[David Miller 717]

4 minutes ago, RaVeM4nn4t33 said:

If it was your ban I wouldn’t have gotten a reduction at all. Your a shit admin 

@ -dante-

You didn't even do anything this time and your still a shit admin XD

[Type03 31]

Free Dante leave him alone stop harassing him 

[Deshoku 56]

1 hour ago, RaVeM4nn4t33 said:

If it was your ban I wouldn’t have gotten a reduction at all. Your a shit admin 

@ -dante-  gives reductions though what??

just gotta tell him that youre not sorry and youd do it again. 

[Grandma Gary 10529]

3 hours ago, RaVeM4nn4t33 said:

Make it make sense. Tank event. Guy shoots my tank and disables it before the event starts. I kill him when he gets out of the tank. I receive a ban and he does not 

Ban was for event disruption btw. I think disabling my tank before the event starts would be disruption 

@ CaloomClark

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

2 hours ago, Deshoku said:

@ -dante-  gives reductions though what??

just gotta tell him that youre not sorry and youd do it again. 

Real!!

5 minutes ago, Grandma Gary said:

@ CaloomClark

Please do. Id like to know if he was also banned for event disruption 

[CaloomClark 1352]

9 minutes ago, RaVeM4nn4t33 said:

Real!!

Please do. Id like to know if he was also banned for event disruption 

he was

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

2 minutes ago, CaloomClark said:

he was

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOTTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Seems as if he can get away with breaking the rules. Also seems as if your both in aegis. Crazy how that works. Care to talk about that @ Grandma Gary  seems like there’s some fishy stuff going on here 

[CaloomClark 1352]

3 minutes ago, RaVeM4nn4t33 said:

Seems as if he can get away with breaking the rules. Also seems as if your both in aegis. Crazy how that works. Care to talk about that @ Grandma Gary  seems like there’s some fishy stuff going on here 

that kid was in devre mate

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

2 minutes ago, CaloomClark said:

that kid was in devre mate

So why isn’t he banned again? Seems he broke the same rule. Kinda fishy 

[David Miller 717]

we are waiting @ CaloomClark ! The people demand answers for your crimes!

[MAV 1733]

39 minutes ago, RaVeM4nn4t33 said:

Seems as if he can get away with breaking the rules. Also seems as if your both in aegis. Crazy how that works. Care to talk about that @ Grandma Gary  seems like there’s some fishy stuff going on here 

Caloom is also no longer in Aegis.. 

Lawyered…..

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

6 minutes ago, MAV said:

Caloom is also no longer in Aegis.. 

Lawyered…..

Banning me but not banning someone else for the same rule break. Fishy. 
 

lawyered……

[CaloomClark 1352]

The decision to ban the player in the tank who killed the other player, rather than banning both, was based on the nature of their respective actions and the severity of their impact on the event. While the first player who damaged the tank acted inappropriately, their action did not result in significant disruption; it was an isolated issue that could have been addressed through the appropriate channels, such as notifying staff for intervention.

However, the second player escalated the situation by retaliating with lethal force, effectively removing another participant from the event before it even began. This not only disrupted the event but also set a poor example for handling conflicts within the game. By taking matters into their own hands in a way that significantly undermined the event, their actions warranted a more severe response to uphold the integrity of the event and maintain fairness for all participants.

4o

 

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

[L1on 8]

Someone sent me my address via discord, said he was gonna show up to my house, while we were ingame. Told him if he showed up to my house that I would shoot him. @ -dante- gave me an acknowledgement warning that if I did that again I'd get a lengthy ban. Make it make sense

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

9 minutes ago, CaloomClark said:

The decision to ban the player in the tank who killed the other player, rather than banning both, was based on the nature of their respective actions and the severity of their impact on the event. While the first player who damaged the tank acted inappropriately, their action did not result in significant disruption; it was an isolated issue that could have been addressed through the appropriate channels, such as notifying staff for intervention.

However, the second player escalated the situation by retaliating with lethal force, effectively removing another participant from the event before it even began. This not only disrupted the event but also set a poor example for handling conflicts within the game. By taking matters into their own hands in a way that significantly undermined the event, their actions warranted a more severe response to uphold the integrity of the event and maintain fairness for all participants.

4o

 

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

Effectively removed him from the event huh? admin revived him 30 seconds later and he played through the event. He broke a rule. therefore you should be taking disciplinary action. but your not gonna do that because none of the admins on this server perform that role correctly except for a select few. And you are not one of them.

12 minutes ago, CaloomClark said:

The decision to ban the player in the tank who killed the other player, rather than banning both, was based on the nature of their respective actions and the severity of their impact on the event. While the first player who damaged the tank acted inappropriately, their action did not result in significant disruption; it was an isolated issue that could have been addressed through the appropriate channels, such as notifying staff for intervention.

However, the second player escalated the situation by retaliating with lethal force, effectively removing another participant from the event before it even began. This not only disrupted the event but also set a poor example for handling conflicts within the game. By taking matters into their own hands in a way that significantly undermined the event, their actions warranted a more severe response to uphold the integrity of the event and maintain fairness for all participants.

4o

 

ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info.

He also significantly undermined my event by disabling my tank before the event started. but no action will be taken against him right. Because its just a little rule break. And you wonder why the server is dying. You dont enforce the rules correctly 

@ CaloomClark  Responds to that with a clown emoji because he doesnt wanna speak on why he doesnt enforce the rules just because it wasnt a "severe" rule break. Had he not done that. I would not be banned. Looks like he should have received disciplinary action when he broke the rule.

[David Miller 717]

13 minutes ago, L1on said:

Someone sent me my address via discord, said he was gonna show up to my house, while we were ingame. Told him if he showed up to my house that I would shoot him. @ -dante- gave me an acknowledgement warning that if I did that again I'd get a lengthy ban. Make it make sense

YEAH LETS MAKE THIS ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT @ -dante- !!!!

[RaVeM4nn4t33 2]

Just now, David Miller said:

YEAH LETS MAKE THIS ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT @ -dante- !!!!

I think he has more than enough lmfao 

[L1on 8]

3 minutes ago, David Miller said:

YEAH LETS MAKE THIS ANOTHER THREAD ABOUT @ -dante- !!!!

I never made a thread, just made a comment, hello?

[David Miller 717]

4 minutes ago, L1on said:

I never made a thread, just made a comment, hello?

Taking over a thread about @ CaloomClark  to complain about @ -dante-  hello? Mr.Condescending ass question.  This is the roast of Caloom and we will not be silenced!

[L1on 8]

Just now, David Miller said:

Taking over a thread about @ CaloomClark  to complain about @ -dante-  hello? Mr.Condescending ass question. 

Genuinely my bad then, after all the threads recently I just assumed. @ CaloomClark is doing great as a mod