Now this is a good fucking update.

Good update!!!

You had me at tinfoil hat! Nice work!!

11 minutes ago, Mighty said:

Damn designer @ TapTap afk this month 

I just didn't get @'d for my contributions  I did tha houses thing

was the auto clothes bug fixed where it deletes scopes and supps ?

10% tax reduction on transfer of warpoints? why is this needed?

for money if you dont want tax reduction you pull it out and give cash, can warpoints have some sort of same concept?

19 hours ago, proud said:

10% tax reduction on transfer of warpoints? why is this needed?

for money if you dont want tax reduction you pull it out and give cash, can warpoints have some sort of same concept?

fairly certain the tax is meant to decentivize people just doing runs and then buying mass amounts of warpoints that they wouldn't be able to get otherwise because its meant to be a skill based currency. Although the issue could be solved by just making them not transferable

31 minutes ago, monster said:

fairly certain the tax is meant to decentivize people just doing runs and then buying mass amounts of warpoints that they wouldn't be able to get otherwise because its meant to be a skill based currency. Although the issue could be solved by just making them not transferable

i feel like if anything it should tax warpoints from the person receiving them instead of the one sending them.

5 minutes ago, proud said:

i feel like if anything it should tax warpoints from the person receiving them instead of the one sending them.

Pretty sure that its the same both ways essentially, could be entirely wrong but I think it takes the tax from the amount you're sending, for example you want to send 80 wps someone it takes 8 from the 80 and the person receiving only gets 72, I'd have to look in game but based on how its stated in the changelog it sounds about right.

On 11/21/2022 at 6:24 AM, proud said:

i feel like if anything it should tax warpoints from the person receiving them instead of the one sending them.

Elaborate, that would make 0 sense. 

1 hour ago, Rafa said:

Elaborate, that would make 0 sense. 

to elaborate, why tax warpoints? it still makes 0 sense to me why warpoints need taxing. theyre the hardest currency to gain for many and i dont see the need for making 10% of all transferred warpoints disappear into thin air.

i guess what i wrote made 0 sense cuz either way warpoints are going to be removed from the transfer, but again no point in the transfer tax to exist.

money has a way of not being taxed, aka giving cash, why cant warpoints have some sort of same concept if the transfer tax sticks?

10 minutes ago, proud said:

to elaborate, why tax warpoints? it still makes 0 sense to me why warpoints need taxing. theyre the hardest currency to gain for many and i dont see the need for making 10% of all transferred warpoints disappear into thin air.

i guess what i wrote made 0 sense cuz either way warpoints are going to be removed from the transfer, but again no point in the transfer tax to exist.

money has a way of not being taxed, aka giving cash, why cant warpoints have some sort of same concept if the transfer tax sticks?

If my recollection is correct, people were defending the “gold standard” idea that warpoints are meant to be an exclusive currency meant for those who would earn them by fighting cartels and warred gangs and were advocating that they shouldn’t be a trade-able currency at all. I personally think that’s silly af, because at the end of the day, what does it matter. I would assume the tax is some sort of compromise to that end

4 hours ago, Rafa said:

If my recollection is correct, people were defending the “gold standard” idea that warpoints are meant to be an exclusive currency meant for those who would earn them by fighting cartels and warred gangs and were advocating that they shouldn’t be a trade-able currency at all. I personally think that’s silly af, because at the end of the day, what does it matter. I would assume the tax is some sort of compromise to that end

The reason it matters is because if I want to sell warpoints, for example 3000 for 30mil, 300 of those(10%) would disappear into thin air. This is why I am against the tax, because if I were to transfer the 3k then 3mil worth of warpoints would simply disappear. At the moment, I don't want to do anything but spend my warpoints, before the tax I would sell the warpoints for money in game.

Maybe a more reasonable thing would be 10 warpoints transfer fee for all transfers, that way its only 100k of warpoints that disappear(which is still alot).

23 minutes ago, proud said:

The reason it matters is because if I want to sell warpoints, for example 3000 for 30mil, 300 of those(10%) would disappear into thin air. This is why I am against the tax, because if I were to transfer the 3k then 3mil worth of warpoints would simply disappear. At the moment, I don't want to do anything but spend my warpoints, before the tax I would sell the warpoints for money in game.

Maybe a more reasonable thing would be 10 warpoints transfer fee for all transfers, that way its only 100k of warpoints that disappear(which is still alot).

Ah i agree with you the tax is dumb, I’m questioning the reasoning as to why people think they need to be taxed or restricted for transfers in the first place