Pulldowns? Questionable?

[Pablo 29]

Just now, Joel said:

I meant forums. but atleast you tried

You dont own the forums, you own this thread on the forums.

[JoeL 1297]

11 minutes ago, TheRandomOne said:

And yet I've seen you cheat on the cqc server a couple of times. You even posted it to your YouTube....

I obviously wasnt using anything there I was trying to shoot like I had arthritis.

Just now, Pablo said:

You dont own the forums, you own this thread on the forums.

Dont even own the thread ekkse dee mong.

[Sonny Asif 495]

Just now, SamMonk said:

If you ain't from asylum stop talking you 200 rnd mag spraying plebs from GTA/Olympus with 0 skill, 

Regards,

SamMonk, The Asylum legend.

http://i.imgur.com/Bp8ahlo.mp4 

[Sanik 7]

Just now, Sonny Asif said:

http://i.imgur.com/Bp8ahlo.mp4 

*insert Failfish*

[TheRandomOne 477]

20 minutes ago, Joel said:

I obviously wasnt using anything there I was trying to shoot like I had arthritis.

Dont even own the thread ekkse dee mong.

@Dante Fleury still have the video? 

[JoeL 1297]

2 minutes ago, TheRandomOne said:

@Dante Fleury still have the video? 

I meant the video I linked with the recoil.

I was straight hacking in that cqc video

lol 

[TheRandomOne 477]

Just now, Joel said:

I was straight hacking in that cqc video

lol 

"On your neck for no reason", eh?

[JoeL 1297]

3 minutes ago, TheRandomOne said:

"On your neck for no reason", eh?

Talking about the gta retards above ^

[Monomer 83]

What if you made a pulldown that pulls down so hard it makes your aim worse? If this is the case then do they deserve to be punished for giving themselves a disadangtage rather than an advantage? Is it the fact that they have a third party influencing their gameplay or the fact that they are using that third party to gain an edge. If it is wrong to use a third party to gain an edge then why isn't it against the rules to have a nice computer or use a mouse that has adjustable dpi? How are we able to draw a line that determines if a third party modification is unfair? Who can actually say that having a $2000 processor is okay even though it gives you a significant performance increase and that having a script to adjust the pulldown of your mouse is unfair? What good is a script if you have such incredibly low quality pc parts that you only get 10 fps? The $2000 CPU guy is likely to win even though the other guy is using something bannable. So if even though owning a nice pc gives a direct, significant impact to gameplay, it is against the rules to use a pulldown even if they only get 10 fps and need something to balance out the playing field

[Solomon 368]

30 minutes ago, Jay said:

What if you made a pulldown that pulls down so hard it makes your aim worse? If this is the case then do they deserve to be punished for giving themselves a disadangtage rather than an advantage? Is it the fact that they have a third party influencing their gameplay or the fact that they are using that third party to gain an edge. If it is wrong to use a third party to gain an edge then why isn't it against the rules to have a nice computer or use a mouse that has adjustable dpi? How are we able to draw a line that determines if a third party modification is unfair? Who can actually say that having a $2000 processor is okay even though it gives you a significant performance increase and that having a script to adjust the pulldown of your mouse is unfair? What good is a script if you have such incredibly low quality pc parts that you only get 10 fps? The $2000 CPU guy is likely to win even though the other guy is using something bannable. So if even though owning a nice pc gives a direct, significant impact to gameplay, it is against the rules to use a pulldown even if they only get 10 fps and need something to balance out the playing field

No.

[Augustus 799]

51 minutes ago, Jay said:

What if you made a pulldown that pulls down so hard it makes your aim worse? If this is the case then do they deserve to be punished for giving themselves a disadangtage rather than an advantage? Is it the fact that they have a third party influencing their gameplay or the fact that they are using that third party to gain an edge. If it is wrong to use a third party to gain an edge then why isn't it against the rules to have a nice computer or use a mouse that has adjustable dpi? How are we able to draw a line that determines if a third party modification is unfair? Who can actually say that having a $2000 processor is okay even though it gives you a significant performance increase and that having a script to adjust the pulldown of your mouse is unfair? What good is a script if you have such incredibly low quality pc parts that you only get 10 fps? The $2000 CPU guy is likely to win even though the other guy is using something bannable. So if even though owning a nice pc gives a direct, significant impact to gameplay, it is against the rules to use a pulldown even if they only get 10 fps and need something to balance out the playing field

why would you do that 

[RambleR 1138]

2 hours ago, SamMonk said:

If you ain't from asylum stop talking you 200 rnd mag spraying plebs from GTA/Olympus with 0 skill, 

Regards,

SamMonk, The Asylum legend.

Go home. 

[Snare 2701]

2 hours ago, SamMonk said:

If you ain't from asylum stop talking you 200 rnd mag spraying plebs from GTA/Olympus with 0 skill, 

Regards,

SamMonk, The Asylum legend.

https://clyp.it/jhnpyjjo

[TheRandomOne 477]

9 minutes ago, Snare said:

https://clyp.it/jhnpyjjo

When/how did that become an insult anyway?

[zoomzooooooom 2383]

[Monomer 83]

1 hour ago, Solomon said:

No.

So intricately put, @Solomon. You have swayed my reasoning.