We have a T5 vigilante, now we can work the kinks out on what is fair and not fair for them to have.
There will have to be compromises from all of you guys, we can't just go adding a ton of shit to a faction that previously made way too much money without ever balancing things on the lower end as well.
It also is unfortunately not just my decision. Things have a process and plenty of checks and balances. I have to get civ council to agree to changes first and fore most, which currently they aren't willing to agree to a 6.5, high bounty payout, or any real buff at all. Try as I may, I cannot change that. I've spoken to each of them and even held meetings up by arguing my point for over an hour. It doesn't change the fact that the overwhelming majority of the council disagree with me and do not thing vigilantes need anything better than they currently have.
As dumb as you are, @HoesMad, I can't possibly expect you to understand this.. but I'll say it again just to make sure I tried:
I don't make final decisions on anything. I do not have the power to approve something just because I am the lead rep for vigi's. I can only suggest things, argue for them, and if they get approved take them to the staff meeting and do the same. You seem to want a broken system where the rep's can just do whatever they please without the rest of the server arguing against it or having a chance to be the check and balance. That's just not how it works, and for a damn good reason.