I counted the clothing + weapons but still doesn't beat the fact that "realistically" you would pay more for decent armor than your weapon.
I'd appreciate my life over my weapon.
You say it's not realistic to pay more for your armor than your weapon, think about it from a real life perspective not a Arma pov.
We're here to talk about removing CSAT not how much armor cost in real life.
It cost around 17k to suit one U.S Military soldier only $400 of that is a M16 rifle which is only a 5.56mm and a 7.62 cost nearly around $700. Not all of the remaining 16.5k is armor but most of it.
So yes it is realistically that armor cost more than your weapon... Life > Weapon
You said realistically, this is a game we're your clothing tanks more than your vest.
If CSAT cost 200k and a Mk1 cost 130k people wouldn't buy it because they would rather just go out and buy a new Mk.
I'm not saying make it cost that much I just recommended something :))
You increased the price of GA rigs awhile ago but like you said they aren't the reasoning behind the tanking... CSAT Fatigues are really the only nice looking clothing. So you could just increase the price of CSAT. Wouldn't fix the problem but if keeping them gets the most votes increasing the price is a start ://
Just reading this post makes my teeth grind.
This John man is accusing me of false sayings and is evading my privacy @Bubbaloo Burrito
If you could delete this post It would make me happy.