Milo
-
Posts
427 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
15
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Events
Store
Blogs
Gallery
Raffles
Everything posted by Milo
-
I was gonna write a post saying exactly this. I'd agree this was a server rule break but given the directive was "leave or die", makes the entire situation kinda petty. The medic did what he thought was best in this situation, even if it was technically wrong. The server wouldn't be a very fun place to play if we did ban on petty stuff like this. -
@ XBlackxBirdX Congrats!! @ ZeroBlade May not have particularly been your largest supporter but regardless welcome
-
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
- Report
-
Admin? Let's pray he doesn't make it that far.
Still, not a worse pick than Caloom
-
-
1
-
2
-
2
-
- Report
-
Cops being dickheads just to annoy players. Make APD great again.
Milo replied to Wezio 's topic in General Chit-Chat
If I were you I would definitely still submit the IA. Although it appears their handbook allows this, I can't imagine they would wanna set the precedent that cops are able to do this. If you submit one they may still take action and may even be willing to reword their own handbook. If not then I am sure a civilian representative could bring it to roundtable as that really shouldn't be a standard for civilian and cop interactions, especially if you guys are paying your tickets. -
@ Saul Goodman Still an approved item just needs to be picked up by one of us to do
-
I knew @ Rexo couldn't handle being the only furry in APD leadership- congrats @ Element_ on FTO!!!
-
-
1
-
2
-
- Report
-
Don't rob Milo and leave him 800m from a garage
Milo replied to hasan1 's topic in General Chit-Chat
All seriousness though if you believe there was any wrong-doing please submit a Staff IA- it would be handled by people higher than me -
All do respect I think you're being dismissive of my entire point. A demand asking a Medic or APD member to break a handbook rule is not a reasonable demand as then they would be liable for that violation internally within the faction. Any other reasonable demand would have sufficed. Perhaps that is something we could add to the supplemental section to make it more implicitly clear but I don't think by precedent valuing ones life should take priority over handbook rules. It would be extremely harmful if civilians could walk up to medics and say "give me your R&R skinned heli or die".
-
Honestly I can understand the ban reason. Under the Altis Life Rules Supplemental page in the RDM common misconceptions section it states: In this case here I would opt to say that the demand was not reasonable. I would equate it similar to if someone asked a medic to drop their uniform or other medic specific gear. Although medics must value their lives, they must value the handbook first and they cannot comply to such a demand that asks them to break it. For what it's worth, I don't see a ban like this making much of a difference for those aspirations. The APD requires you not have a ban for two weeks prior to your application for it to be accepted but I could see them waiving this if you explained the circumstances. As for administration, although no recent bans is highly desired; there also is really nothing saying having a recent ban makes you ineligible. Realistically no one is immune to mistakes and that's why the Staff IA section exists. For a report like this I would've personally given a warning- really just not a super big deal in my eyes. You might be able to negotiate that in supplement of your ban if your concern is having it on your record. The warning would still remain part of your record as well but it won't bar you from joining the APD at all in any case. A complete lift though would probably be too far out of the question since I would agree that this was ultimately a rule break. Anyway either way I wouldn't fret it
-
If I am being completely honest, you're probably cooked for a long time. The majority of cheaters we ban stay banned forever. The ones who do get unbanned usually have to wait 3 years to even be considered. Cheating is one the worst infractions one can make as it gives you an extremely unfair and gameplay ruining advantage over other players. For that reason we take it very seriously and the appeal process is quite harsh.
-
I'm not sure I'd say they don't do anything to deserve it but the hostage taking concerns are definitely fair and legitimate concerns to have.
.thumb.jpg.b22e027bfd951dc87b839d3428e10ed3.jpg)
