PoptartRex

Why would they talk about a server 2 black water on server 1 over side chat. This is literally the definition of a special circumstance that would fall under "common sense".

1. Yes. 2. $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

The easter egg was already claimed! Sorry you didn't get to it first!

Yes - Add that charge

This is a pointless post that is clearly aimed to harass a member of the community. Locked. You don't even have proof that it was SV.

KyS Withdrawing my vote

@Excision won two gang wars tho.... He don't need that protection

I mean, if he just asked you to go to the ATM then you should probably comply otherwise he is allowed to kill you. But he cannot kill you if he then asks you to take money out of your bank as that is not a demand we allow anyone to do. @willi

This will now be the first count of a forum post lifting a ban in a long time. Shoutout to the PO who still reported after comp was given. You the real

Scamming is allowed. No comp from staff would be issued. @BucKaY

I just think that warning shots and/or side chat should still be viable to engage medics here. The medics themselves might be neutral but we must remember that everyone they revive are instantly engaged with the terror group, which would make medics an indirect threat that can be an issue to the terror group. Terror cities are a very dangerous place, but to catch an RDM ban for killing a medic that is reviving people who are engaged to you seems kind janked to me. It's not like the medic doesn't know what is going on/what they are getting themselves into. There are messages right in his side chat to look at. Obviously just sending a text or engaging in direct would engage the medics and it isn't a super hard thing to do either, but all I am saying is that the medic isn't very bright if he can't point out the obvious threat in the city. I feel like warning shots should suffice at the very least in a terror to engage a medic since the terror group literally has to send a shit load of texts before he can start a terror. I am not trying to start an argument here by any means, just expressing my personal opinion. You are the Head Coordinator and I will respect your decision. EDIT: I would also not be apposed to no NLR for medics here, as in a normal situation like this IRL, medical personnel would not consist of 2 - 5 people.

I agree with this update (EMTs should respond to terrors) but I am questioning this: Why make it harder to engage medics during a terror? The party that does a terror already has to send at least 22 texts for a full 30 minutes terror. One for side chat warning to start in 5 minutes, then one to APD dispatch for 5 minutes about to start, then they have to do that again when it starts, then another pair every 3 minutes after that (for a total of 22 texts). With this update, you could no longer just give warning shots to medics. You now have to send even more texts to engage the medic since it is no longer considered a red zone for medics. What is your opinion? @Isaac Newton

Both the staff and the sAPD took a major hit today. I remember watching you work on the Gang Wars sheets, and sending you a PM on the forums to help. That was the official start of what would now be a long career with Olympus. I always looked up to you as kind of a role model. I was Goodman Jr. You got support team, then I did. You got Senior Support Team, Then I did. Once you got Moderator, I decided to give it a shot and made the cut as well. I continued to follow you through Senior APD. It has been a good run. I will miss you quite a bit. Make sure to drop in every once in a while and pop a LIMA-R-RITA. THE RATS WILL LIVE ON @Jordan540 You have big shoes to fill @Future Admin You also have big shoes to fill.

Now I am stuck on this and I can't revert ;-;

Get better man. You will be missed. I still remember on Tanoa when I first met you as you were making APD Hunters fly.

About damn time. I will let @G.O.A.T. fill out the paperwork.... You have 24 hours to reconsider.