Fps

[OC | Christian 25]

What pc specs : fps on the server do y’all get?

 

i just upgraded my pc and still can’t get over 40fps on the server, even with a beefier cpu

 

my specs: 

AMD 2920x 12 core threadripper

MSI RTX 2080

gigabyte x399 AORUS Pro

Nzxt Kraken x62 280mm

64gb DDR4 viper 3600mgz ram 8x8GB sticks)

 3tb Samsung SSD (1x1TB 1x2TB)

 250gb Samsung m.2 970 evo series

 1000watt EVGA

 

Idk if I’m missing something or is this game really that badly optimized

 

[Hunter 130]

i got a GTX 1080 and a  I 7700k 4.2 ghz 

i can get around 40-50 in citys and 80-100 outside of citys it is a trade off performance vs game looking good

[James Berrington 26]

Its the AMD processor idk what it is but AMD doesn't run Arma good... at all, so get an intel instead

[Vcx 1039]

look who's back

[obeymatt 299]

Arma does not like amd cpus at all

[PoptartRex 3294]

What settings are you using in-game?

[OC | Christian 25]

1 minute ago, TheCmdrRex said:

What settings are you using in-game?

basically all mid range settings so like standard average, at 1920x1080 res - I went into arma launcher and did all the basic things, allocated 20gb of ram to the game (more than i assume it will ever need), all 12 cores from cpu and all of my GPU VRam to it aswell.

 

26 minutes ago, BossLnD said:

Its the AMD processor idk what it is but AMD doesn't run Arma good... at all, so get an intel instead

hmmm maybe i swap back and get the i9 instead, but would have to replace MOBO too ;-; 

23 minutes ago, Vac. said:

look who's back

shh

[Lemon Haze 33]

Yeah amd has no support for a lot of games that came out before amd got back in the game. All games usually favor intel processors regardless of which one is actually better. Its not your computer its the game

[Kamikaze 1178]

Arma is a single core game which Intel thrives in as for AMD not so much.

[Ziggyuwu 49]

i7 6700k oc @ 4.6ghz with a 1080 doing 2050 mhz and i get like 40 fps in kav and 80 everywher else

[Caleb Snackbar 198]

Turn settings all the way up 

[ThatNerdyGuy 5914]

1 hour ago, Kamikaze said:

Arma is a single core game which Intel thrives in as for AMD not so much.

I reccomend you look at the recent AMD 3rd gen benchmarks. There is no gap in raw performance, just certain games but only at over 100 fps.

1 hour ago, Lemon Haze said:

Yeah amd has no support for a lot of games that came out before amd got back in the game. All games usually favor intel processors regardless of which one is actually better. Its not your computer its the game

This man knows his stuff.

[Kamikaze 1178]

5 hours ago, ThatNerdyGuy said:

I reccomend you look at the recent AMD 3rd gen benchmarks. There is no gap in raw performance, just certain games but only at over 100 fps.

This man knows his stuff.

I know AMD is still very very competitive for its price and its performance in newer games but for arma it's just no where near the performance of an Intel CPU.

[ThatNerdyGuy 5914]

7 hours ago, Kamikaze said:

I know AMD is still very very competitive for its price and its performance in newer games but for arma it's just no where near the performance of an Intel CPU.

I can understand for Arma. Ancient architecture and engine natively perform better with Intel. However, there is no performance gap now. AMD are putting out faster processors on smaller dies with higher power efficiency. It's not just a price for performance scenario. The fact is that AMD produces the fastest processor on the market for the first time since 2004.

[OC | Christian 25]

11 hours ago, ThatNerdyGuy said:

I can understand for Arma. Ancient architecture and engine natively perform better with Intel. However, there is no performance gap now. AMD are putting out faster processors on smaller dies with higher power efficiency. It's not just a price for performance scenario. The fact is that AMD produces the fastest processor on the market for the first time since 2004.

Well im seeing more issues with my performance in other games such as ForkKnife - i get the same if not less fps than i friends with a 1060 and mid range i7 cpus, maybe this cpu just REALLY isnt meant for gaming? Looking into buying a new i9 9900k and new mobo to avoid these issues all together (arma and other games)

[Ryanx1 72]

I9-9900k @ 3.5gz

rtx 2080 ti

asus ROG strix z390-e gaming

h150i pro

32 gigs Corsair vengeance

1tb M.2 Samsung evo SSD

4tb western digital black at 7200rpm

1000W EVGA Gold Super Modular

40-60 FPS in cuties 70-80 outside on ultra windowed

[Joce 256]

I9-9900k @ 4.9gz

rtx 2070

asus hero ix

h150i pro

16 gigs Corsair vengeance  3200mhz

512g M.2 Samsung evo SSD

4tb western digital black at 7200rpm

i run on a 4k 75" TV on ultra everything fullscreen.(60hz native)

55-60fps even on a rainy kavala night.

[maxg 1270]

22 hours ago, KeithR said:

 

40-60 FPS in cuties 70-80 outside on ultra windowed

 

cities*

[ChillX 406]

PSU : 500W

PROCESSOR : Intel (R) Core(TM) i7-8700 [email protected] GHz

CPU : Intel Core i7


GRAPHICS CARD : GeForce GTX 1660 TI

RAM : 16GB DDR4

I mean when its full server I get like 40 fps in kav, 100 elswhere, does me just fine

[Corps 222]

On 7/29/2019 at 12:57 PM, Kamikaze said:

Arma is a single core game which Intel thrives in as for AMD not so much.

What this mans said 

[ChillX 406]

27 minutes ago, Corps said:

What this mans said 

what this man said

[OC | Christian 25]

update 

2 hours ago, ChillX said:

what this man said

 

3 hours ago, Corps said:

What this mans said 

 

On 7/29/2019 at 12:57 PM, Kamikaze said:

Arma is a single core game which Intel thrives in as for AMD not so much.

update, got new mobo, and a new cpu (i7 9700k). Just got them installed testing game tonight - already noticed a huge fps jump in other games because that 2920x really wasnt a cpu meant for gaming. I ended up throwing that into a stream pc for encoding and running a bunch of tasks / windows