Lethal force is authorized only when non-lethal force has failed or is inadequate to resolve the situation. ~handbook
if a cop tazes a pilot in a orca do u think he will put on a jetpack and fly up to restrain you? Only solution to take you down is lethal force.
Agreed. the taze/restrain on cop seems logical but just to prevent it from being overpowered rules should be implemented to prevent this from happening at the fed/jail/BW.
So a father and his son is walking through a park. The son steps on a honeybee and the father says no honey for two weeks. They continue the walk and the son steps on a butterfly and the father says no butter for two weeks. Later that evening they see the son's mother step on a cockroach. the son looks at his father and says "Are you going to tell her, Dad, or do you want me to?".
damn you rex
The gap between a 7.62 and a 9mm is pretty big if I must say. if vigi's are given a 6.5 there is still a gap in combat advantages. The gap is not gone, rebels still have the upper hand in a 1v1 scenario. If a guy with a 7.62 cant win against a 6.5 then they lost the bounty GG, better hope your 5 other friends can win against a most likely solo vigi. 1+ for the buff.