Bloodmoon

4 hours ago, billdroid said:

Ryan killed the server nice

No one cares about your useless little emo clique u call civilian council 

ty

@Rossco This is how you allow your support team members to conduct themselves?

shieeet i better have an npc named after me

Just now, Rossco said:

So now I'm meant to surrender anytime I see three people I'm engaged with 

3-1 rules are still the same.

4 minutes ago, Rossco said:

• Change to the 3 to 1 rules so the hostage-takers must announce that  a "3 to 1" is taking place for cop to be required to surrender - DENIED because any cop with common sense should know when they're 3 to 1'd

Please explain why this was denied

Because when a cop is outnumbered and engaged they should put their hands up in order to value their life, no matter the intent.

12 minutes ago, Mighty said:

No, I'm talking about the rules. One started and I couldn't get anyone on to go cause of how sketchy the rules are.

What do you mean? You just go there code 3 and clap.

14 minutes ago, EvanFowler said:

@DeadPool yeah let us wire/give invoices to medics so we can comp them like are you trying to get people banned now

Last time I checked deadpool isn't a senior medic

4 minutes ago, NokiaStrong said:

lets be real here if he meant staff he wouldnt have said council

Lets be real here I'm pretty sure he also meant staff looking back at it now. 10 admins, 3 seniors, 1 owner, 14 people. Not to mention that civ council has plenty more than 14. 

7 minutes ago, Titimus said:

"My intention by resigning and not taking the role of Lead Developer is not to try and fuck the server, but I want to be somewhere that has a community that is run by the community and not a 14 person council who can do whatever the fuck they want."


Remove all added towers from BW- having 4 towers mutually covering each other at BW makes it very hard for the APD. REJECTED to see what the change passed during the previous meeting does to the balance first (removing one of the twins).

 

Good to see the thing you guys enjoy doing is staying the same, atleast someone in high power could call you out on your shit. lmao
 

You think civ council makes the decision in what the apd/r&r can implement? LOL come back when you're better informed.

2 minutes ago, PJ228 said:

Is there really any point to that? Im just confused on why they would disable it.

 

Because medics sit in kavala betting instead of reviving?

2 minutes ago, Eased said:

To clarify... does this mean Medics cannot initiate or receive bets at all?

ya

Give rex senior dev

7 minutes ago, Google said:

If I wanna buy a house right now I have to give money to someone then have them sell it so I can buy it. Can't we just make that system automatic for the houses? Asylum has it.

maybe, also no one forces you to go first in trades 

1 minute ago, Google said:

I'm posting again but it combines it. And I mean I just want to be able to buy houses without being potentially scammed...

What do you mean scammed?

3 minutes ago, Google said:

Business is business.

Actual question:

Why can't I sell my house for any amount I want. Why do I HAVE To sell it to market?

Please stop editing your responses in thanks, but a player could be lazy and not want to sell it to another player, the house could not have been refreshed, could not have found a buyer.

2 minutes ago, Google said:

Yes

No but real talk. If a player has $3mil he can just keep refreshing his house for one year and then he'll have to make money again. Like it's not going to change anything....

You're assuming that people are never going to change in account balance. If you don't see that a house upkeep gives opportunities to new and old players to potentially find houses off market then I fear for the CQC administration team, or you're just trying to push your own agenda, whatever that is.

1 minute ago, Google said:

F U C K that. It's not about what you guys what you mongs. It's about what the players want.

Players want to run around with 2 bil, are you saying we should let them keep all the hacked money?

Just now, Google said:

What? Dude if they wanna combat that then reduce the timer or something like fuck that. I'd rather not pay that as an active player.

For example let's say some Tree guy with $80mil goes inactive and just keeps refreshing his houses.

They can refresh their house 320 times.

That's 26 years.

Paying 10% to refresh on a house that players should already making money off of, if you can't afford it and sell it, then good that's what we want. If you can't afford it and do more runs, good thats what we want. If you can't afford it and lose it, good that's what we want.

27 minutes ago, Google said:

Who the fuck suggested a tax on houses? That's gay asf

I didn't tell my civ council member I wanted to be taxed. Fuck that you cunts

Combating inactive players from indefinitely refreshing houses with no penalty, yea fuck you civ council.

13 minutes ago, Orgondo said:

Nerfing Black Market down to 5% is far too overpowered. The locations are easier to defend than the real processors and from Gather-Process-Sell its always far quicker at a Black Market rather than to the real processor hut.

Seems balanced to me considering you aren't able to double process at black markets, announces a capture, and as well as a healthy cop population on at all hours.

5 minutes ago, Orgondo said:

Lol you think that matters? You are trying to make BM the way it was in 2015 yet you obviously don't remember 2015 very well then. MC owned Heroin Black Market literally 24/7 and was always running it. The whole server knew they were doing it however they were hardly ever robbed because of how easy it is to defend and the shear amount of property available there.

There aren't really any big gangs that do runs anymore, only those that come to mind are those that own shine and meth sheds across all servers, not to mention that the gangs that still focus on runs are pretty bad.

42 minutes ago, Titimus said:

When you have a big group of friends controlling civ council, they’ll push their agenda before everyone else. No surprise vigilante is getting nerfed again. @Gregbot

 

good thing Tarkov finally wiped and I could get off Olympus for a bit 

dirt cheap loadouts with 90% money made off bounties, does that sound right?

1 minute ago, Gregbot said:

When I hop on my vigilante alt I us need to buy gear it usually costs me 300k-350k

wtf are you buying lmao? Definitely isn't at a vigi shop.

OUT OF THE WATER SALVAGE RATS

bye bye salvage 

14 hours ago, Wiz Kali said:

I think you guys should remove salt i have been looking to rob someone at salt for the past 2 months and i have yet to see anyone do it.

Not seeing people do it =/= people aren't doing it

1 minute ago, Cale said:

So I think 15% processing times for owning the cartel isn't too good. I think if you would increase that number, the gangs that do runs would fight more cartels and promote more cartel fighting and more runs. What do you guys think? I know I would be fighting a lot more if I knew my processing times may be cut down by a quarter or a half of the time by owning the cartel.@Bloodmoon @indian @NokiaStrong @Mudiwa 

It's fine the way it is