Should Cops be able to be tazed and restrained?

[Outcast 601]

Lets hear your opinion 

[-dante- 5168]

From my 3 feds/BW and 3 times being restrained from being tazed in the back, I 100% say it has made doing feds/BW way too easy for civilians. I understand why it came about and how it makes sense that a civ could realistically restrain a civ. Hell, im 100% OK with it in the cities. I dont believe it should at Feds/BW/Jails though. If anything.

[Guest Excision]

pretty easy fed honestly but no they should not be able to get tased and restrained

[AlphaKennyBody 0]

haha thanks for the easy fed boiiisssss

[Austyn 32]

Was wondering where all the cops went.

[silton 4174]

I think you shouldn't get tased in the first place ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Tman15tmb 1827]

The real question is, now that CSAT isn't a big issue should we take the SPAR 16 out of the vigi shop sense its being abused? I would say if you took 10 players from the server that choose to use the SPAR 16, only one.. maybe two of those players would be using a vigi gun for legal vigilante purposes. It's clear its getting abused. "You abuse it, you lose it."

[silton 4174]

9 minutes ago, Tman15tmb said:

The real question is, now that CSAT isn't a big issue should we take the SPAR 16 out of the vigi shop sense its being abused? I would say if you took 10 players from the server that choose to use the SPAR 16, only one.. maybe two of those players would be using a vigi gun for legal vigilante purposes. It's clear its getting abused. "You abuse it, you lose it."

Can confirm the gun used in this situation was a cop MXM remove the spar 16 dad

[AlphaKennyBody 0]

ban a gun that wasn't used?? the salt is real

[Grandma Gary 10477]

ITT: Civs say yes, cops says no.

Nailed it.

[AlphaKennyBody 0]

the gun used was robbed off a cop from a fed. 

[Tman15tmb 1827]

42 minutes ago, Silton said:

Can confirm the gun used in this situation was a cop MXM remove the spar 16 dad

How did the rebel acquire the MXM without first using a SPAR? I would be shocked if they chose to use a Sting instead.

[silton 4174]

Just now, Tman15tmb said:

How did the rebel acquire the MXM without first using a SPAR? I would be shocked if they chose to use a Sting instead.

3 to 1 and Hostage situations? not using tasers. How people have been acquiring for a long time   

[Guest]

14 minutes ago, Lil Bill said:

were giving them a taste of there own I love it now its not op it even tbh now taze us before we can taze you the cops don't like getting tazed? then win the fight https://gyazo.com/85d8e40c1035e88c8748e8243d478552

https://gyazo.com/85d8e40c1035e88c8748e8243d478552

kind of the fucking point is for the cop to die and for the civ to tazed/restrained or lethaled? Lets just make everyone have tazer's and restrain each other. +1 on the logic lololol

[Tman15tmb 1827]

Just now, Silton said:

3 to 1 and Hostage situations? not using tasers. How people have been acquiring for a long time   

You have to admit even if some rebels acquired their guns through robbing a cop before this update pushed, a lot of civs have bought a SPAR 16 and have robbed cops a lot easier than when the Sting was the only non lethal option available for purchase.

[silton 4174]

6 minutes ago, Tman15tmb said:

You have to admit even if some rebels acquired their guns through robbing a cop before this update pushed, a lot of civs have bought a SPAR 16 and have robbed cops a lot easier than when the Sting was the only non lethal option available for purchase.

Now i didn't think you could restrain cops? But if they changed it i guess so, i personally haven't seen people get guns like that. But it makes cops think about more than slamming into a wall and keep coming back until they can come guns hot in a hawk. Just my opinion tho ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[Goodman 1089]

It's all good just pull out a ghost hawk and the nowadays the civs will run screaming 

OPEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!

[sleazy turd racoon 383]

Have it so a charge is automatically added when you restrain a cop?

[KrispyK 22]

there is no logical reason in a rp scenario why a cop shouldnt be able to be restrained. besides salty cops

[Bubbaloo - Reusable P Cup 3037]

Like @McDili always says. "Magical" rules just ruin the experience. 

[heyday 489]

44 minutes ago, Rogue said:

Have it so a charge is automatically added when you restrain a cop?

^^Something like a nice hefty charge of LEO Hostage charge. Cause as of right now there's no penalty for tazing/restraining cops, well not if you don't get caught.

[Danger 729]

how about if a cop is tazed and restrained at a jail/fed/BW. you can pull ghosthawk and have guns hot. regardless of bomb situation. 

[Mooey 67]

10 minutes ago, Danger said:

how about if a cop is tazed and restrained at a jail/fed/BW. you can pull ghosthawk and have guns hot. regardless of bomb situation. 

I like that.

[FluffyTEDDY 240]

I say keep the taze and restrain of cops, but implement a rule to prevent it happening on fed,jail and BW

[snipeZ 363]

9 minutes ago, FluffyTEDDY said:

I say keep the taze and restrain of cops, but implement a rule to prevent it happening on fed,jail and BW

Agreed. the taze/restrain on cop seems logical but just to prevent it from being overpowered rules should be implemented to prevent this from happening at the fed/jail/BW.