APD Handbook Update 1/15/2019

[Orgondo 2514]

What a fucking joke lolol

[Noahhh! 3608]

[Ryan 7167]

Saying this now if it turns into the shit show I believe it will turn into this is getting a fat 

[|REAL| Boing 172]

Does this mean Sr. APD could collectively vote out a Chief? It doesn't say the Chief can make this decision.. but rather SAPD.. so every SAPD member would get a say I'm sure? lol

[Richard 595]

2 minutes ago, |REAL| Boing said:

Does this mean Sr. APD could collectively vote out a Chief? It doesn't say the Chief can make this decision.. but rather SAPD.. so every SAPD member would get a say I'm sure? lol

Oh big brain.  Lower sAPD made the rule to remove chief.  Nice 

[Toasty 1564]

So like are cops gonna have to start going to the gym now or something?

[Sho 186]

6 hours ago, Sandman said:

2.      At any point if the Senior APD feel you are unfit for your position, your rank can be adjusted accordingly.

@Hurricane

[Creepy 1305]

11 minutes ago, Sho said:

@Hurricane

Is this the real Sho or that guy that uses his name?

[Sho 186]

37 minutes ago, Creepy said:

Is this the real Sho or that guy that uses his name?

• JOINED

  January 10, 2016

[Horizon 514]

Olympus | The Witch Hunt

[Sho-Time 204]

1 hour ago, Creepy said:

Is this the real Sho or that guy that uses his name?

Oof, I've been Sho since before you were alive

[Creepy 1305]

35 minutes ago, ShoTime said:

Oof, I've been Sho since before you were alive

lel

[spotlight uh 7]

15 hours ago, FrankieTwinkletoes said:

jelly doun.... oh wait nvm

LMFAOOOOOOOOOO

[Christoph 159]

Give it a week or so and this is wht it will look like ngl 

https://gyazo.com/537f186ba9f78accbeccf52e43d4e94c

 

Also DEFINE UNFIT in the eyes of sAPD, or am i just gonna have to assume it gonna be bias as hell?

[Kamikaze 1179]

1 hour ago, decla said:

Give it a week or so and this is wht it will look like ngl 

https://gyazo.com/537f186ba9f78accbeccf52e43d4e94c

 

Also DEFINE UNFIT in the eyes of sAPD, or am i just gonna have to assume it gonna be bias as hell?

inaccurate

[codeYeTi 962]

19 hours ago, Pledge said:

I usually agree with you, but honestly, what's the point of sAPD if they aren't "real" managers? (Actual question, not rhetorical lol)

EDIT: To explain, I think that APD became what it was when I stopped playing because people started feeling that they had to make every decision objectively. If you can't handle making decisions well, then you shouldn't be sAPD. I think it's funny how nobody interpreted this as the ability to promote if you're unfit for a lower rank. If you think that the APD leadership doesn't deserve your trust in their decisions, then don't partake in their APD.

EDIT2: I don't know much about the current sAPD, so who knows what it actually means. I'm clearly not in the majority here haha

[Madnesss 360]

NICE UPDATE

[Panda :) 1932]

So you guys are saying that if we promote so guy to corp a year later and they are useless and they do not meet the expectations of a corporal and set an example they should just keep their position? 

Serious question.

[Bloodmoon 2222]

5 minutes ago, Panda said:

So you guys are saying that if we promote so guy to corp a year later and they are useless and they do not meet the expectations of a corporal and set an example they should just keep their position? 

Serious question.

Without telling them and giving them a chance to reform? Yes.

Not to mention that to get corp you're looking at like 300 hours of cop minimum which is a pretty big time investment, and to be able to yoink that without any warning is pretty yikes.

[Christoph 159]

5 minutes ago, Panda said:

So you guys are saying that if we promote so guy to corp a year later and they are useless and they do not meet the expectations of a corporal and set an example they should just keep their position? 

Serious question.

i mean its the sAPD that say if they work for their rank with hours that they should keep it. Also surely you think that this is a bit hypocritical as well considering the fact that sAPD all basically do the minimum and show no proper commitment or rule knowledge to an extent. not only that but i have still yet to here YOUR views of an expectation a corp has to hold ngl. 

[Millennium 5953]

54 minutes ago, Panda said:

So you guys are saying that if we promote so guy to corp a year later and they are useless and they do not meet the expectations of a corporal and set an example they should just keep their position? 

Serious question.

nah bc clearly they earned it if u guys gave them corporal. Shouldn't be demoted unless they genuinely do something against the server rules/handbook. Some people get burned out after a while and make their minimums or just play when they want. It happened to me. shit got boring quick.

Probably gonna demote @decla cuz he is an idiot and disliked by seniors.

also kinda concerning when everyone that has replied thinks it is retarded.

[Richard 595]

Damn, Rule change by Dep Chief one day and the next day Chief “retires”.  Swift action.  Tricked us all.

[darn fool 232]

On 1/15/2020 at 8:46 PM, rapidaax said:

They have been able to coup chiefs just hasnt been stated in the rules

Wtf does that even mean

Can I petition to promote myself sergeant since we're making up rules? This seems like one hell of an implied power 

[|REAL| Boing 172]

Looks like I was right boys, this was simply to coup the chief!

Also all his buddies

[Airborne 630]