ThatNerdyGuy

Maxes out at like 70 or 75 percent for t4. I forget the others.

It's totally not.

o7 to a great dude. I remember playing cop with you on Tanoa. Neither of us knew what roles we'd have in this community in the future but you've made the best of every situation tasked with.

Congrats on your second forum post of the year! @Sandman

If someone isn't following list or robocoping send it in as a IA report. If we don't see it happening then we can't fix it.

Yes they can but they are also not a whitelisted faction either. Cops have to take tests and are held to higher RP standards than most Vigilantes will partake in. Now, if you ever gets your vigi ripped or deranked without proper reason, submit an IA Report and we will look at it.

What you said about cop is not entirely true. There is risk, getting robbed and losing your loadout. Not to mention, the majority of cops that ever play the faction will never get passed Patrol Officer. A slim few will get Corporal and an even slimmer few will get Senior. You can also lose your rank by not following APD or Server rules.

I'm not trying to have every Tom, Dick and Harry running around with them. That's what the issue was last time we had them. With a hatchback you can pit someone, that's what I've been doing for the last year. Big facts! Hell, I'd be for cutting payouts in half for all areas. As for cops I'd like the reduce those payouts too.

F's in chat everyone

Woah dude Staff is already 18+ except exceptions for really talented individuals.

Yes, we are still accepting applications.

Please submit a ban appeal at https://olympus-entertainment.com/support/

Here are my opinions to what you posted: 1. Not a horrible idea 2. This get's complicated, if a gang wants cops to keep coming and they are fighting them, then we should be able to keep coming back. 3. This would be better if the wording would be that the threat is neutralized or so in and so forth 4. I mean, not always do cops including higher ups want to lethal. Maybe someone has a huge bounty and we'd rather bring him in? You shouldn't be able to get 5 mill bounty by sitting on cap and not be able to be brought in because you only stay on cap. (I'm referencing a situation regarding cartel only players) 5. +1, unless a ghosthawk follows someone in, in the first place. 6. I mean, we still have to text. This just adds complication to a non necessary situation. Armored glass and tires are dumb strong to take out. 7. I thought it was reduced but if it wasn't, 30 minutes should be the very max. 8. I've had deputies not have enough money to buy their first loadout let alone pay for one all the time. At the end of the day, cops are required to respond to certain situations and forcing them to pay at them is dumb. Never in a million years would I +1 this. The only time is when raiding warzone which was already passed and implemented, just needs fixed. I would rather reduce the income of cops between 25% and 40%, depending on rank. 9. If not there anywhere else not near a city so FPS isn't as low. 10. +1, should be without cops following wave rule. Just makes it so we don't have people getting banned because they shot on sight. 11. Not sure about reducing the timer but what about removing the bolt cutting for one of the doors? Then you have about a 22 and a half minute timer until bomb blow.

+1 I've said this ever since it was passed in a civ council roundtable, it needs to happen.

Bye