From my perspective I’d say the stream having a full run through AT LEAST a full day before would’ve been very very nice. I understand that people can be busy leading up to the date, so maybe just having a time set aside to make sure that runs smoother in the future would be nice for the spectators trying to see who can roach the furthest away! @ Eemil
I’d also say further defining of processes to catch potential cheaters, exploiters etc. specifically, if someone is suspected of doing x y z, you’d ask them for evidence within the next 2-3 minutes so they could at least have the opportunity to hit the alt f10. This one is a little bit picky, but since not much went wrong I think it deserves some thought. I’d imagine the only real drama we faced during this gw would’ve been no drama at all if a well defined suspected exploiter/cheater system had been thought of before hand.
Lastly, multiple streams would be ideal IMO. I know I had some viewers on my stats stream who thought my second perspective (typically looking down onto cap) was more preferred then DP’s close up cam. Having 2 people streaming would just add another chance for spectators to get the view they most prefer.
I think overall like @ Zahzi has already said, given the circumstances, time, and overall ability we had, we did very well. Did everyone love it? No, but that’s typically what happens anyway. We were done by 5 pm EST…. THATS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. We also slid out of this one with only 1 issue the whole time, again NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. There were a lot of good things about this GW, and there were things we can improve on as well. I just wanna say thank you to those that made this happen! @ DeadPool @ Doc @ Martinezzz @ Zahzi @ Masoooooooooon @ destruct @ Maddox @ Millennium and @ Orgondo
I’m sure I missed some people that did more work then I realize, and I want to thank those individuals who know who they are as well.